Re: connection deltas

2001-04-12 Thread Pete Forman
Stefan Monnier writes: Just guessing. I refuse to believe that someone would write a shell whose history file feature cannot be turned off. The POSIX/UNIX rules for shells mandate that history cannot be turned off, unless the shell is invoked non-interactively :-( -- Pete Forman

Re: connection deltas

2001-04-12 Thread Stefan Monnier
"Pete" == Pete Forman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stefan Monnier writes: Just guessing. I refuse to believe that someone would write a shell whose history file feature cannot be turned off. The POSIX/UNIX rules for shells mandate that history cannot be turned off, unless the shell is invoked

Re: connection deltas

2001-04-12 Thread Kai Großjohann
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Stefan Monnier wrote: Oh no! Here-documents! Kai, is there a good reason for using here documents here ? Maybe there was, once upon a time. I have now changed it and did a quick test. Seems to work. New version in CVS. Please test. kai -- Be indiscrete. Do it

check in by grossjoh: 'tramp/lisp tramp.el,2.13 ChangeLog,2.10'

2001-04-12 Thread Kai Grossjohann
Update of /services/emacs-rcp/cvsroot/tramp/lisp In directory lucy:/export/home/grossjoh/work/kai/tramp-devel/tramp/lisp Modified Files: tramp.el ChangeLog Log Message: (tramp-handle-write-region): Don't use here document, just send encoded file on stdin. Suggested by Stefan Monnier.

Re: connection deltas

2001-04-12 Thread Stefan Monnier
"Pete" == Pete Forman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It is moot as to whether /dev/null is suitable for HISTFILE. While it does have read and write permissions I would infer that the shell expects to be able to read back what is written. A robust implementation should be able to cope but can we

Re: connection deltas

2001-04-12 Thread Pete Forman
Stefan Monnier writes: On the other hand `HISTFILE=/dev/null /bin/ksh' will not work if the user's SHELL is not bourne-like, which is more annoying. Yes I do realize, I was simplifying in that message. And I don't think we can rely on /usr/bin/env being available, so it's not clear how

Re: connection deltas

2001-04-12 Thread Kai Großjohann
On 12 Apr 2001, Stefan Monnier wrote: On the other hand `HISTFILE=/dev/null /bin/ksh' will not work if the user's SHELL is not bourne-like, which is more annoying. And I don't think we can rely on /usr/bin/env being available, so it's not clear how we can reliably set the env var before

Re: connection deltas

2001-04-12 Thread Ted Stern
Stefan Monnier writes: Stefan On the other hand `HISTFILE=/dev/null /bin/ksh' will not work if Stefan the user's SHELL is not bourne-like, which is more annoying. In csh-like shells, you can often do env HISTFILE=/dev/null /bin/ksh /usr/bin/env is available on Solaris, at

Re: connection deltas

2001-04-12 Thread Stefan Monnier
"Ted" == Ted Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: /usr/bin/env is available on Solaris, at least. Experience shows you can't rely on it being available. And in any case it's not much better than `ksh -c "HISTFILE=/dev/null exec ksh"' Stefan

Re: disable shell history, was: .sh_history problem

2001-04-12 Thread Tom_Roche
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12 Apr 2001 17:30:49 +0200 Anyway, could somebody with a ksh try various things to turn off its history? How soon they forget :-) http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-rcp@ls6.cs.uni-dortmund.de/ has a thread ".sh_history problem" that started Sat, 17 Mar 2001. It has 9 posts

Re: connection deltas

2001-04-12 Thread Tom_Roche
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12 Apr 2001 18:26:16 +0200 Is there any reason not to send "HISTFILE=/dev/null" during the connection initialization? In my experience setting HISTFILE=/dev/null did not work: ksh merely made a tempfile. This might be n=1, however. Perhaps someone else can try some things on

Re: disable shell history, was: .sh_history problem

2001-04-12 Thread Stefan Monnier
For example, what happens if we do "HISTSIZE=0" in addition to "unset HISTFILE"? IIRC I tried that, and it didn't work: ksh made temp files. Have you tried /dev/null ? Also since the current code doesn't use here-documents any more, your .sh_history file should grow much slower now (it

Re: connection deltas

2001-04-12 Thread Stefan Monnier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In my experience setting HISTFILE=/dev/null did not work: ksh merely made a tempfile. Of course, this still uses up disk space, but now that only actual commands rather than file contents go into the history file, it's less of a concern. The remaining question is:

Re: connection deltas

2001-04-12 Thread Tom_Roche
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In my experience setting HISTFILE=/dev/null did not work: ksh merely made a tempfile. "Stefan Monnier" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12 Apr 2001 17:53:49 -0400 Of course, this still uses up disk space, but now that only actual commands rather than file contents go into the

Re: connection deltas

2001-04-12 Thread Ted Stern
Re the .kshrc hack: For your reference, here is what I do: In ~/.profile, add the line ENV=$HOME/.kshrc; export ENV In ~/.cshrc, add the line setenv ENV ~/.kshrc Flogging the dead horse ... if you ever run bash or zsh, also add to your ~/.{bash,zsh}rc files:

Re: tramp samba anyone?

2001-04-12 Thread Tom_Roche
Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12 Apr 2001 16:10:37 -0700 Is [SMB] too different from the other protocols tramp understands? Preface my remarks with "not being a tramp expert," but ... I believe SMB is the next level down from the protocols tramp uses. To put it rather non-technically (and

check in by grossjoh: 'tramp/lisp tramp.el,2.14 ChangeLog,2.11'

2001-04-12 Thread Kai Grossjohann
Update of /services/emacs-rcp/cvsroot/tramp/lisp In directory lucy:/export/home/grossjoh/work/kai/tramp-devel/tramp/lisp Modified Files: tramp.el ChangeLog Log Message: (tramp-open-connection-setup-interactive-shell): Posix shells don't allow you to turn off the history, so we redirect

Re: disable shell history, was: .sh_history problem

2001-04-12 Thread Kai Großjohann
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Tom Roche wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12 Apr 2001 17:30:49 +0200 For example, what happens if we do "HISTSIZE=0" in addition to "unset HISTFILE"? IIRC I tried that, and it didn't work: ksh made temp files. What was their size? So should HISTFILE be left at a default

Re: check in by grossjoh: 'tramp/lisp tramp.el,2.14 ChangeLog,2.11'

2001-04-12 Thread Tom_Roche
Kai Grossjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 13 Apr 2001 01:45:27 +0200 Log Message: (tramp-open-connection-setup-interactive-shell): Posix shells don't allow you to turn off the history, so we redirect it to an innocuous file and limits that file's size as much as possible. I can try this out.

Re: tramp samba anyone?

2001-04-12 Thread Tom_Roche
On 12 Apr 2001, Harry Putnam wrote: Has anyone every fiddled with getting tramp to work over smb protocol? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13 Apr 2001 01:28:16 +0200 Tramp wants a login shell and expects to be talking to a Unixish system on the remote end. You could install an sshd and a bash on the

Re: tramp samba anyone?

2001-04-12 Thread Kai Großjohann
On 12 Apr 2001, Harry Putnam wrote: Has anyone every fiddled with getting tramp to work over smb protocol? Tramp wants a login shell and expects to be talking to a Unixish system on the remote end. You could install an sshd and a bash on the remote system, and if it looks sufficiently

Re: tramp samba anyone?

2001-04-12 Thread Harry Putnam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Grojohann) writes: On 12 Apr 2001, Harry Putnam wrote: Has anyone every fiddled with getting tramp to work over smb protocol? Tramp wants a login shell and expects to be talking to a Unixish system on the remote end. You could install an sshd and a bash on the