"Tom Roche" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/24/00 7:28:28 AM
and when you reach this point, switch to the *rcp/foo* buffer, erase
it,
C-x k *rcp/k [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
No! Erasing the buffer is not the same as deleting it. I meant C-x h C-w.
kai
--
I
Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/25/00 12:18:39 PM
[ssh into the remote host, /bin/sh, and enter the following, minus
the ASCII art:]
/
| $ PS1='
| /
| '; PS2=''; PS3=''
|
| /
\
You enter the first three lines. I'm guessing that for you, the empty
fourth line is
"Tom Roche" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
$ # Waiting 30s for `unset MAIL MAILCHECK MAILPATH'
$ $ PS1='
/
'; PS2=''; PS3=''
# Waiting for remote `/bin/sh' to come up...
/
[[INCOMPLETE!]]
/
[[INCOMPLETE!]]
Hm. Try the following on the remote host:
/
| $
Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/24/00 7:28:28 AM
and when you reach this point, switch to the *rcp/foo* buffer,
erase it,
"Tom Roche" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
C-x k *rcp/k [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/25/00 6:13:39 AM
No! Erasing the buffer is not the same as
"Tom Roche" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| $ PS1='
| /
| '; PS2=''; PS3=''
|
| /
| @
with cursor at '@'. The empty fourth line _is_ there.
So you get the same that I get. So it should work for you. But it
doesn't. I'm mystified.
Does anybody out there have any idea what
"Tom Roche" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You have 131 messages (627467 bytes) on uni00map.unity.ncsu.edu
Volume Name Quota Used %Used Partition
users.t.tlroche 4 26997 67% 60%
tcsh: using dumb terminal settings.
Running user
"Tom Roche" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# Waiting 30s for `set +o history'
$ # Waiting 30s for `unset MAIL MAILCHECK MAILPATH'
$ $ PS1='
/
'; PS2=''; PS3=''
# Waiting for remote `/bin/sh' to come up...
/
[[INCOMPLETE!]]
Did the last fix to rcp.el fix your problem,
"Tom Roche" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* The local servers do have
KerberosAuthentication yes
Can rcp.el be made to do what is necessary to thus auth?
I don't know. What is necessary to do that? Kerberos seems to be
rather rare on this side of the pond, so...
Can you use ssh from
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Tom Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/24/00 7:28:28 AM
But why doesn't it see the shell prompt? Hm. The shell prompt seems
to be correct: newline followed by the slashes, followed by another
newline.
Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
