Re: convince NTemacs it _can_ symlink

2001-03-19 Thread Tom_Roche
I wrote: [when in tramp, and] I try to symlink, NTemacs becomes confused: Symbol's function definition is void: make-symbolic-link presumably because it knows it can't do this ... on _its_ filesystem. On 18 Mar 2001, Andrew Innes wrote: It probably makes sense for all file functions that

Re: convince NTemacs it _can_ symlink

2001-03-19 Thread Kai Großjohann
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Tom Roche wrote: Could this be added to tramp-util? It certainly adds utility for NT trampers, and (AFAIK) testing I think that Eli is right with his warnings, but I've now put adding something like this on the todo list. You will have to call a function to set this up,

Re: convince NTemacs it _can_ symlink

2001-03-18 Thread Tom_Roche
On Mon, 05 Mar 2001 12:10:56 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: when I try to symlink [under tramp], NTemacs becomes confused: Symbol's function definition is void: make-symbolic-link Andrew Innes [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18 Mar 2001 15:30:12 + As a work-around, you can define `make-symbolic-link'

convince NTemacs it _can_ symlink

2001-03-05 Thread Tom_Roche
I now have TRAMP http://ls6-www.informatik.uni-dortmund.de/~grossjoh/emacs/tramp.html working on a vanilla 20.7.1 on w2k using plink http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/ Key the brass band. Allow a moment to savor./ Among the thrills I now experience is running dired on my