On Tue, 30 May 2000, Kai Großjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> "Daniel Pittman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Bleh. I think that detecting the end of line convention is seriously
>> broken. The coding system, yes, but the line endings should be fixed.
>> I think.
>
> I think that the idea
"Daniel Pittman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bleh. I think that detecting the end of line convention is seriously
> broken. The coding system, yes, but the line endings should be fixed. I
> think.
I think that the idea is sound, but there must be a bug in the code,
regarding the timing. Hm.
On Mon, 29 May 2000, Joe Stoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I should have known better than to upgrade to the newest rcp.el before
> getting on with my "real" work ...
*grin* After I went to all that effort to put big threatening warnings
into the documentation 'bout precisely this as well. ;)
I should have known better than to upgrade to the newest rcp.el before
getting on with my "real" work ...
Here are two debug buffers (with irrelevant lines removed), both from
an NT client, both to Solaris servers. The first one is a
transatlantic connection.
--
tcsh: using d