On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Angus Lees wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 11:01:26AM -0500, John Walstra wrote:
> > Is there anyway to have multiple apaches running, on different
> > ports, by different users and fake out semaphores? Would NullLocker do it?
>
> use something other than SysVSemaphoreLocker
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 11:01:26AM -0500, John Walstra wrote:
> Is there anyway to have multiple apaches running, on different
> ports, by different users and fake out semaphores? Would NullLocker do it?
use something other than SysVSemaphoreLocker, eg: FileLocker
NullLocker is good if your data
This is a fun one.
Apache-Session-1.03
HTML-Embperl-1.2.1
mod_perl-1.24
I have Apache::Session working properly. Our developers are
using Embperl with use custom packages. They develop off of one server. In
order to have seperate work environments, I'd had to make custom httpd.confs
with apache
Hi all,
I am leaving now for two weeks of holiday and I will take _no_ email with me
:-) So hopefully others can and will answer question in this time...
I have hoped to release 1.3b6 and 2.0b1 before my holiday, but my time
wasn't enought to do so, so it's something left to do afterwards.
Have
> I have 3 RH 6.2 boxes where in 2 the Semaphore locking gives
> "permission denied" and in one it works. The difference is that the
> one that works is running apache and mod_perl from rpm's and the 2
> that don't work have Apache and mod_perl compiled from source! I
> wonder if this is the cas
I have 3 RH 6.2 boxes where in 2 the Semaphore locking gives
"permission denied" and in one it works. The difference is that the
one that works is running apache and mod_perl from rpm's and the 2
that don't work have Apache and mod_perl compiled from source! I
wonder if this is the case with oth
