>The rush is over, I'm sitting by the pool in Cancún, and here's the log.
Oops, $val3 is something that is left over from debugging some table
handling code, that had forgotten to remove.
Go to the file Embperl/Syntax/EmbperlBlocks.pm, search for $val3, you should
see a line which contains:
..
At 5:01 PM +0100 2/16/02, Gerald Richter wrote:
>I case you have some free minutes, please set EMBPERL_DEBUG to 0x7fff
>and send me the embperl.log file you get (will be very long, but this
>doesn't matter)
The rush is over, I'm sitting by the pool in Cancún, and here's the log.
The other (m
At 4:18 PM +0100 2/26/02, Gerald Richter wrote:
>Wait for 2.0b6. 2.0b6 have moved from HTML::Embperl to Embperl namespace, so
>you are able to install both at the same time. You can run your production
>with 1.3.4 and test with 2.0 without interferences.
That's great news! I was going to set up
Yeah you were right. In some of my custom module, I put print function for
test purpose and this was the cause.
THanks
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Richter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
Looks like you have some print's in your code, either print to OUT or set
optRedirectStdout in EMBPERL_OPTIONS (or remove the print's if possible)
Gerald
-
Gerald Richterecos electronic communication services gmbh
Internetconnect *
It's OK with IE but on netscape, I see web server information displayed on
the top of the web page.
Below is the actual HTML code.
Anybody knows why this is happening? This happens to a specific page (Not
all pages.) when I see it from netscape.
THanks
>
REMAIN:8
CURRENT
Gerald Richter wrote:
> This only works in 2.0bx, not in 1.3.4. I see if I could add the [$ var $]
> to 2.0, so you don't have these kinds of problems
Thanks, Gerald. I look forward to being able to test out 2.0 on my
existing codebase, so that I can help in finding lingering bugs.
Meantime, I'll
>
> Sorry, looks like I misunderstood the syntax here. I thought you could
> just put [$ var $] (without any variables) to force the file to use the
> equivalent of 'strict'.
>
You just used it in a way I never tought of :-)
> > Put a [* use strict ; *] at the top of your page, by this you shoul
> Wait for 2.0b6. 2.0b6 have moved from HTML::Embperl to Embperl namespace, so
> you are able to install both at the same time. You can run your production
> with 1.3.4 and test with 2.0 without interferences.
Ok...
> > Ok, so I've installed 2.0b5 now, and here's the first problem. Is [$ var
> >
>
> I haven't used [* *] yet, mainly because the documentation still says
> it's very experimental.
Yes it is experminetal, but it works as long as you don't mix loops and
conditionals from Embperl and from Perl
>
> I have tried to test out Embperl 2.0b5 before, but put off real effort
> because
> sorry for directing this problem directly to you, but I wasn't sure where
> else to send it: the problem I'm having is as below:
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the correct mailing list address
> >
> > I installed embperl from http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppmpackages/ -
this
> Ok, so I've installed 2.0b5 now, and here's the first problem. Is [$ var
> $] not valid any more? I have that on line 1 of one of my subroutine
> files, executed using Execute ({object => ...}). I get the following
> error: (this is using EmbperlObject)
>
> [1410]ERR: 24: Error in Perl code: 'u
Gerald Richter wrote:
>
> You can use 'my' or 'local' just like in Perl with 2.0:
>
> [$sub foo $]
> [* my $a *]
>
> .
>
> [$endsub$]
>
> BTW: [* local $x *] already works since 1.2
I haven't used [* *] yet, mainly because the documentation still says
it's very experimental. Also, the do
13 matches
Mail list logo
