Re: Perl DBIx::Recordset article

2003-11-03 Thread Terrence Brannon
Nelson Ferraz wrote: Dear Mr. Terrence Brannon, Hi Nelson, I've read your article about DBIx::Recordset at Perl.com (Feb. 27, 2001), and I thought that this module could be very useful in an open source project I'm currently developing: a web based CRM, which can be used to manage informat

Re: make failed with 2.0b9

2003-11-03 Thread embperl-return-6008-archive=jab . org
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 02:19:35PM +0100, Andre Landwehr wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 01:47:08PM +0100, Benni Baermann wrote: > > at apache2-startup-time. Is this because of an to old mod_perl? Maybe > > i should try compile mod_perl myself? > > You should do that just to be sure, since it doe

Re: make failed with 2.0b9

2003-11-03 Thread Andre Landwehr
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 05:07:00PM +0100, Benni Baermann wrote: > Any hints? Whats this apr-0? In the debian-decription they are > referenced as "development package for the apache runtime". > > Why are they not included in Embperl? they are part of apache, not of embperl. Andre ---

Problems in 2.0b8

2003-11-03 Thread Kaare Rasmussen
Hi I encountered some problems when I wrote components for Embperl 2.0b8. I wonder if they are solved now ? 1. header / footer It's logical to be able to have header / footer code, but it wasn't possible. Is this solved now ? 2. subs and row counter When using subs from within a table, it was

Re: make failed with 2.0b9

2003-11-03 Thread Benni Baermann
Hi! I added -I/usr/include/apr-0 manually in Makefile.PL. After this the missing-files errors did not appear any longer. Instead there are some new errors(see below). The variables seems to be compatibility declarations in /usr/include/apr-0/ Any hints? Whats this apr-0? In the debian-decription

Re: make failed with 2.0b9

2003-11-03 Thread Andre Landwehr
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 01:47:08PM +0100, Benni Baermann wrote: > at apache2-startup-time. Is this because of an to old mod_perl? Maybe > i should try compile mod_perl myself? You should do that just to be sure, since it doesn't take long, but I can't say if it will help. Just try it... hint: get

Re: make failed with 2.0b9

2003-11-03 Thread Benni Baermann
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 02:15:28PM +0100, Andre Landwehr wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:48:51PM +0100, Benni Baermann wrote: > > I have two running Embperls. One with Apache 1/ Emperl 1 at Debian and > > one with Apache 2/ Embperl 2 on Redhat. To simplify things i tryd to > > make Embperl-2.0b