RE: cgi-bin & %udat

2005-03-10 Thread Gerald Richter
> Or do I continue to run it as an Apache::Registry script, and > call SetupSession some other way? > Yes, you continue with Apache::Registry and use SetupSession to get the session data (and CleanupSession to close it). The other possibility would be to run gbroswe under Embperl (with EMBPERL_

Re: cgi-bin & %udat

2005-03-10 Thread allen haim
Hi, I can wait for the release -- it's not that urgent. But I don't understand: in order to call Embperl::Req::SetupSession, I need run gbrowse under Embperl, right? So what are the steps to make this ordinary cgi script run under Embperl, so that I don't have to modify the script at all? Or do

RE: Segfault or no content

2005-03-10 Thread Dan Wilga
At 2:56 PM +0100 3/10/05, Gerald Richter wrote: > But that still doesn't explain why EMBPERL_OBJECT_BASE is being ignored. I think it's because the files section is picked up by Apache, while the location isn't. Moveing the Embperl_Object_Base to the files section and deleteing all but the direc

RE: DBIx::Recordset 0.26 - patches lost, docs old

2005-03-10 Thread Gerald Richter
> Subject: DBIx::Recordset 0.26 - patches lost, docs old > My version is based on the last thing you commited to svn. Either there was a problem with my svn update or you don't have commited everything. There was an svn, but it is not available at the moment due to an server move. I will reinsta

RE: Segfault or no content

2005-03-10 Thread Gerald Richter
> > But that still doesn't explain why EMBPERL_OBJECT_BASE is > being ignored. I think it's because the files section is picked up by Apache, while the location isn't. Moveing the Embperl_Object_Base to the files section and deleteing all but the directoryindex from the location section, should

RE: cgi-bin & %udat

2005-03-10 Thread Gerald Richter
> Here is what I would like to do: > > There is a script called 'gbrowse', which I didn't write, but > which I need to call from within my embperl application. This > script works by printing to STDOUT. > > So why not just keep it in my Apache::Registry directory and > call it like an ordinar

Re: DBIx::Recordset 0.26 - patches lost, docs old

2005-03-10 Thread Angus Lees
At Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:18:22 +, Terrence Brannon wrote: > * My 0.25a release of Recordset contained a number of patches. [...] > None of this is in 0.26 They are merged correctly (I believe) in the Debian libdbix-recordset-perl 0.26 package. > * 0.26 also has the older docs which show the l