Ok, I try to fix it during the next days
Gerald
Von: Michael Stevens [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Mai 2013 15:38
An: Gerald Richter
Cc: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: handling query strings with ? in
Yes, I think the CGI.pm behaviour is good, and would
Yes, I think the CGI.pm behaviour is good, and would like it if Embperl was
the same.
On 3 May 2013 14:36, Gerald Richter - ECOS wrote:
> > Is there anything that can be done to make embperl behave more as
> expected?
>
> ** **
>
> What is what you would expect? I think the way CGI.pm is co
> Is there anything that can be done to make embperl behave more as expected?
What is what you would expect? I think the way CGI.pm is correct regarding the
specs. Is that what you would expect?
Gerald
Von: Michael Stevens [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Mai
That url *should* be
http://www.example.com/mjs/q.epl?a=b&c=d
Yeah, ? is valid in the query string, but only the first one is special. &
is supposed to separate field value pairs after the first ? starts them.
If you can't change the code that generates the URL, that is... sad. I
wouldn't exp
Hi.
We're trying to handle some odd query strings in embperl, eg:
http://www.example.com/mjs/q.epl?a=b?c=d
embperl parses this as:
Using %fdat FieldValuea b?cd
CGI.pm parses this as:
Using CGI.pm FieldValueab?c=d
I agree that these are some pretty bizarre queries, but annoyingly we can't
ch
