I figured it out by process of elimination.
I was passing in an anonymous sub to an embperl sub and
my sub did this:
sub {shift->{a} . shift->{b}}
when there was only one argument.
So Embperl's only role here was in obfuscating the stack.
-mda
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:05:07 -07
t;
> You can also use Execute ({inputfile => '...', import => 1}) to import
> subs that are declared va [$sub$]
Instead I'm now doing Execute ({inputfile => '...', package => __PACKAGE__})
which has the benefit (or deficit for perhaps other cases) that it'll get
all symbols, not just the [$sub$] symbols.
-mda
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which might be in your
> case some html.
So just to confirm my understanding:
if a sub uses only [- -] and returns an html value, then it can and
should be called with [+ +].
alternatively, the sub can use [+ +] internally and the caller can
use [- -] to call it.
just don't mix the
rywhere without qualification?
So I would do this in myfuncs.epl :
[! use MyModule qw(func1 $VAR1); !]
and then I do elsewhere
[! Execute 'myfuncs.epl' !]
[+ func1() +]
-mda
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
I figured out my problem.
I was using [+ my_sub() +] instead of [- my_sub() -]
where my_sub was defined using [$ sub my_sub $] ... [$ endsub $]
It wasn't obvious to me (nor do i see it documented anywhere),
but calling such subs with [+ +] seems to wreak havoc.
-mda
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 10:
Does the EmbperlBlocks syntax really ignore everything outside
of embperl block?
I don't have a minimal test case yet, but it still seems
to be randomly rearranging content and disappearing my table
tags and whatnot.
-mda
---
d and therfore
> not documented. So don't use it.
Well, I didn't use it deliberately. I just misread
http://www.ecos.de/embperl/pod/doc/Config.-page-2-.htm#sect_44
and thought I could set output mode to "XML".
-mda
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
