Hi,
I have finally solved my problem.
In the Inline::C documentation, there is a section on what is required to
run Inline stuff under mod_perl. Mod_perl is a little different to the
standard perl interpreter in that some code normally brought in at compile
time cannot be as the interpreter
Hi,
>
> I have solved the problem.
I am glad to hear that!
> In the Inline::C documentation, there is a
> section on what is required to run Inline stuff under mod_perl. Mod_perl
is
> a little different to the standard perl interpreter in that some code
> normally brought in at compile time ca
>
> Thanks for your comments. I will try this. However, I think the problem
> may be more fundamental than this. If I modify the embpexec.pl script to
> use Balclutha::User, it manages to find the
> Balclutha::User::Courier::_isValidPwd function.
>
This confirms my suspection. It simply has so
Hi,
> Does anyone out there know why the use directive is not fully functional
> when embedded in a HTML::Embperl script ?
there are nothing special with use under Embperl. After rereading your
example, I see that you are mixing [! !] and [* *], this may be the problem,
because [* *]
I am still working on this *** BUG ***, and it is quite a difficult one to
crack. I am trying very hard not to have to delve into the internals of
either of these packages, so if I manage to jog anyone's memory to constrain
my efforts, I will be very appreciative.
To reiterate the problem, I
