Voice:+49 6133 925151
> WWW:http://www.ecos.de Fax: +49 6133 925152
> -
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "EmbPerl" <[EMAIL PROT
Hi Neil,
>
> Sorry about not replying sooner.
No, problem!
> Someone hacked into my computers (which
> includes my development machine and my mail server) two weeks ago. They
> exploited an (apparently) well known vulnerability in my version of named,
> and thus gained root access to both my ma
Voice:+49 6133 925151
> WWW:http://www.ecos.de Fax: +49 6133 925152
> -
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "EmbPerl" <[EMAIL
Saturday, October 07, 2000 10:14 PM
Subject: EmbperlObject features
>
> There are two features which I think would be good to have in
> EmbperlObject. I would like to know what you think:
>
> 1. The ability for Execute() to look up the directory tree if it can't
find
> the n
Hi,
>
> There are two features which I think would be good to have in
> EmbperlObject. I would like to know what you think:
>
I think both of the features make sense to me and I will change the
behaviour of EmbperlObject in 1.3b6 accordingly
Thanks for the ideas
Gerald
---
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 12:39:37PM +, neil wrote:
> The problem comes when you have intermediate parent directories (i.e.
> between the current directory and the website root) which may or may not
> have 'file.html' defined - this means that you have to redefine file.html
> all the way up the
Andre Landwehr writes:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 08:14:59PM +, neil wrote:
> >
> > There are two features which I think would be good to have in
> > EmbperlObject. I would like to know what you think:
> >
> > 1. The ability for Execute() to look up the directory tree if it can't find
> > t
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 08:14:59PM +, neil wrote:
>
> There are two features which I think would be good to have in
> EmbperlObject. I would like to know what you think:
>
> 1. The ability for Execute() to look up the directory tree if it can't find
> the named file, in the same way that the
There are two features which I think would be good to have in
EmbperlObject. I would like to know what you think:
1. The ability for Execute() to look up the directory tree if it can't find
the named file, in the same way that the EMBPERL_OBJECT_BASE is searched
for. This would enable more true
