Some new light on the TT performance...
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Linux Hello World Benchmarks...
>
> I've made enquiries and am
> Jashua Chamas has run some benchmarks, which messure the startup overhead of
> different ways the generate HTML output.
For me it would be very interresting to see the results for php too. I
think it's (aside from perl) one of the most used languages for
generating html on the fly.
Anyone has
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 12:49:32PM +0100, Gerald Richter wrote:
> > For the sake of accuracy I have to point out that a later message
> > shows template toolkit can be a serious competitor (when properly
> configured,
> > which is, from the sound of it, more difficult than configuring
> > embperl)
>
> For the sake of accuracy I have to point out that a later message
> shows template toolkit can be a serious competitor (when properly
configured,
> which is, from the sound of it, more difficult than configuring
> embperl):
>
Yes, I saw this this morning too, but the correction was after my p
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 08:56:06PM +0100, Gerald Richter wrote:
> Jashua Chamas has run some benchmarks, which messure the startup overhead of
> different ways the generate HTML output.
> For those who are not on the mod_perl list I append the mail and as you see
> Embperl is the fastest of all te
Jashua Chamas has run some benchmarks, which messure the startup overhead of
different ways the generate HTML output.
For those who are not on the mod_perl list I append the mail and as you see
Embperl is the fastest of all templating solutions :-)
Enjoy Gerald
- Original Message -
From
