>
> Gerald, this is proving quite difficult to nail down to a simple
> minimal case. For me, however, this code seems to produce the effect.
> If I
Appended is a patch that should fix the problem (at least it does for me).
You can also fetch it from the CVS
Gerald
> remove or change an part (e.
Hi Neil,
thanks for the test code
>
> The problem certainly seems to be related to embedded tables. Anyway,
> let me know if this setup causes a runaway on your system, if not then
> I'll try and nail it down to a simpler case.
>
Yes, it does and endless loop here also. I try to find the bug and
Neil Gunton wrote:
> More seriously, I am now encountering a problem with one of my pages,
> where the apache process runs away and fills up all the computer memory
> and swap space very quickly. The only way to recover is to shut down
> apache. I am still trying to nail down why this happens - it
Neil Gunton wrote:
> More seriously, I am now encountering a problem with one of my pages,
> where the apache process runs away and fills up all the computer memory
> and swap space very quickly. The only way to recover is to shut down
> apache. I am still trying to nail down why this happens - it
Gerald Richter wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > No, I don't have any ClearModuleList in httpd.conf...
> >
>
> ok
>
> > Let me know if there's anything else I can do to help track it down...
> >
>
> Could you please try things without preloading on startup and see if it
> works or if you still get the segf
Hi,
> No, I don't have any ClearModuleList in httpd.conf...
>
ok
> Let me know if there's anything else I can do to help track it down...
>
Could you please try things without preloading on startup and see if it
works or if you still get the segfault
Gerald
--
Gerald Richter wrote:
> > so I am testing with that. However I've
> > immediately run into a problem with starting Apache. I'm running
> > 1.3.29, mod_perl 1.29, compiled with gcc 3.3.2 (from source) and Red
> > Hat 7.3 (fully patched).
> >
> > When I start apache, I get the following errors from s
>
> I assume that this patch is in the latest 2.0b10 (which was announced
> the day after this bugfix),
Yes
> so I am testing with that. However I've
> immediately run into a problem with starting Apache. I'm running
> 1.3.29, mod_perl 1.29, compiled with gcc 3.3.2 (from source) and Red
> Hat 7.3
Gerald Richter wrote:
>
> H Neil,
>
> > following code seems to be a minimal case for making the bug manifest:
> >
> > [- $count = 0 -]
> >
> > [$ while $count < 10 $]
> >
> > [- print OUT $count; -]
> >
> > [- $count++ -]
> > [$ endwhile $]
> >
> >
>
> Also you might belie
H Neil,
> following code seems to be a minimal case for making the bug manifest:
>
> [- $count = 0 -]
>
> [$ while $count < 10 $]
>
> [- print OUT $count; -]
>
> [- $count++ -]
> [$ endwhile $]
>
>
Also you might believe that it never will happen, the DL nesting bug is now
f
>
> Gerald, this was from 5th July, and I am not sure what the status of the
> bug is.
Nothing changed since this email :-(
> I know you're pressed for time, but it occurred to me that
> perhaps it would help keep track of Embperl bugs if you used the bug
> tracking system which SourceForge prov
PROTECTED]
p: +61 2 9556 0100
f: +61 2 9556 0111
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Gunton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:11 AM
> To: Gerald Richter
> Cc: embperl
> Subject: Re: Nested Bug in 2.0b9
>
>
> Gerald Richter wrote:
&g
Gerald Richter wrote:
>
> >
> > Unfortunately it's not really possible to replace 'print OUT' with [+ +]
> > in my code, because there are subroutines here which are recursive in
> > nature and so cannot be done using [$ sub $] (at least in 1.3),
>
> Should be also possible in 1.3, also it's more
>
> Unfortunately it's not really possible to replace 'print OUT' with [+ +]
> in my code, because there are subroutines here which are recursive in
> nature and so cannot be done using [$ sub $] (at least in 1.3),
Should be also possible in 1.3, also it's more complicated.
I try to fix the pro
Gerald Richter wrote:
>
> Hi Neil,
>
> I didn't managed to fix the bug so far. The best thing is to use [+ +]
> instead of print OUT, because handling of print OUT is much more complicated
> inside Embperl.
Hi Gerald,
Unfortunately it's not really possible to replace 'print OUT' with [+ +]
in m
Hi Neil,
I didn't managed to fix the bug so far. The best thing is to use [+ +]
instead of print OUT, because handling of print OUT is much more complicated
inside Embperl.
Gerald
--
Gerald Richter ecos electronic communication serv
16 matches
Mail list logo
