Kee Hinckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, I bailed on Template::Toolkit and installed
> Catalyst::View::Embperl::Object.
>
> The Embperl::Object View plugin for Catalyst kind of gets you up and
> running, but it's really not useable overall. It neither integrates
> with Catalyst, nor gives yo
Hi,
>
> I also wonder if it wouldn't be better to get the Mason
> maintainers to look at replacing the core of Mason with the
> fast internals of Embperl and merge some development efforts.
>
I have tried this for some time, when Mason was first published, but I
didn't had sucess.
Now, sinc
mbperl and merge some
development efforts.
Anyway, a couple of thoughts from the peanut gallery.
From: Gerald Richter - ECOS GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 12:55 AM
To: embperl@perl.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Using C
Hi Kee,
First of all thank you for trying to get Embperl back into the light.
As other already supposed I currently don't have as much time left over
for Embperl as I would like to have. Anyway developement doesn't stand
still (also it's only visible in the SVN). I currently working on a big
f
ginal Message-
> From: Kaare Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 10:33 PM
> To: embperl@perl.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Using Catalyst to revitalize Embperl
>
> > WHAT I WANT TO KNOW
> > The question is very simple. Are other people intere
The question is very simple. Are other people interested in going in
this direction? If I put out an Embperl::Object View component for
Catalyst, is anyone going to use it? And if I start discussing how we
can grow and extend Embperl, is anyone going to answer back?
I'm personnally using em
> WHAT I WANT TO KNOW
> The question is very simple. Are other people interested in going in
> this direction? If I put out an Embperl::Object View component for
> Catalyst, is anyone going to use it? And if I start discussing how
> we can grow and extend Embperl, is anyone going to answer back?
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 04:45:02PM -0400, Kee Hinckley wrote:
> WHAT I WANT TO KNOW
> The question is very simple. Are other people interested in going in
> this direction? If I put out an Embperl::Object View component for
> Catalyst, is anyone going to use it? And if I start discussing how
