Re: make failed with 2.0b9

2003-11-10 Thread Benni Baermann
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:33:24AM +1100, Angus Lees wrote: > > /usr/include/apache2/ap_config.h:59: apr_hooks.h: No such file or > > directory > > I presume you have the apache2-dev package installed? Yes, but there seems to be a missing -I in Maekfile.PL. See mails before. Benni -- http://www

Re: make failed with 2.0b9

2003-11-07 Thread Angus Lees
At Fri, 31 Oct 2003 17:48:51 +0100, Benni Baermann wrote: > I have two running Embperls. One with Apache 1/ Emperl 1 at Debian and > one with Apache 2/ Embperl 2 on Redhat. To simplify things i tryd to > make Embperl-2.0b9 at Debian, too. I installed Apache 2 from testing > (Apache/2.0.47). But the

Re: make failed with 2.0b9

2003-11-05 Thread Gerald Richter
Benni Baermann wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 05:07:00PM +0100, Benni Baermann wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I added -I/usr/include/apr-0 manually in Makefile.PL. After this the >> missing-files errors did not appear any longer. Instead there are >> some new errors(see below). > > Ok, finally it works for

Re: make failed with 2.0b9

2003-11-04 Thread Benni Baermann
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 05:07:00PM +0100, Benni Baermann wrote: > Hi! > > I added -I/usr/include/apr-0 manually in Makefile.PL. After this the > missing-files errors did not appear any longer. Instead there are some > new errors(see below). Ok, finally it works for me. But i did not really know w

Re: make failed with 2.0b9

2003-11-03 Thread embperl-return-6008-archive=jab . org
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 02:19:35PM +0100, Andre Landwehr wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 01:47:08PM +0100, Benni Baermann wrote: > > at apache2-startup-time. Is this because of an to old mod_perl? Maybe > > i should try compile mod_perl myself? > > You should do that just to be sure, since it doe

Re: make failed with 2.0b9

2003-11-03 Thread Andre Landwehr
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 05:07:00PM +0100, Benni Baermann wrote: > Any hints? Whats this apr-0? In the debian-decription they are > referenced as "development package for the apache runtime". > > Why are they not included in Embperl? they are part of apache, not of embperl. Andre ---

Re: make failed with 2.0b9

2003-11-03 Thread Benni Baermann
Hi! I added -I/usr/include/apr-0 manually in Makefile.PL. After this the missing-files errors did not appear any longer. Instead there are some new errors(see below). The variables seems to be compatibility declarations in /usr/include/apr-0/ Any hints? Whats this apr-0? In the debian-decription

Re: make failed with 2.0b9

2003-11-03 Thread Andre Landwehr
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 01:47:08PM +0100, Benni Baermann wrote: > at apache2-startup-time. Is this because of an to old mod_perl? Maybe > i should try compile mod_perl myself? You should do that just to be sure, since it doesn't take long, but I can't say if it will help. Just try it... hint: get

Re: make failed with 2.0b9

2003-11-03 Thread Benni Baermann
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 02:15:28PM +0100, Andre Landwehr wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:48:51PM +0100, Benni Baermann wrote: > > I have two running Embperls. One with Apache 1/ Emperl 1 at Debian and > > one with Apache 2/ Embperl 2 on Redhat. To simplify things i tryd to > > make Embperl-2.0b

Re: make failed with 2.0b9

2003-11-01 Thread Andre Landwehr
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:48:51PM +0100, Benni Baermann wrote: > I have two running Embperls. One with Apache 1/ Emperl 1 at Debian and > one with Apache 2/ Embperl 2 on Redhat. To simplify things i tryd to > make Embperl-2.0b9 at Debian, too. I installed Apache 2 from testing > (Apache/2.0.47). B

make failed with 2.0b9

2003-10-31 Thread Benni Baermann
Hi! I have two running Embperls. One with Apache 1/ Emperl 1 at Debian and one with Apache 2/ Embperl 2 on Redhat. To simplify things i tryd to make Embperl-2.0b9 at Debian, too. I installed Apache 2 from testing (Apache/2.0.47). But the Embperl make fails with some errors (see below). I searche