Hello
All standard control theory books assume constant sample rates with no
jitter. This makes the maths solvable. This consistent treatment in
the books may lead to the assumption that jitter is bad. Jitter is
noise and noise is never good but is it significant? Probably not so
long as
Bas Laarhoven wrote:
>
> Ah, thanks John, you made it very clear! So in my situation the input
> sampling moment is fixed (at the start of the thread) and only the
> update of the output varies with the variations in processing time. You
> state this will probably have no noticeable effect, but
Bas Laarhoven wrote:
> Ah, thanks John, you made it very clear! So in my situation the input
> sampling moment is fixed (at the start of the thread) and only the
> update of the output varies with the variations in processing time. You
> state this will probably have no noticeable effect, but a
John Kasunich wrote:
> Bas Laarhoven wrote:
>
>> A question for a guru who has in depth knowledge of the HAL scheduling
>> mechanism:
>>
>> I'm developing a driver for a my servo motor controller. The interface
>> is via a PC parallel port. Only one RT thread is used that processes the
>> pos
Bas Laarhoven wrote:
> A question for a guru who has in depth knowledge of the HAL scheduling
> mechanism:
>
> I'm developing a driver for a my servo motor controller. The interface
> is via a PC parallel port. Only one RT thread is used that processes the
> position feedback from the controlle
A question for a guru who has in depth knowledge of the HAL scheduling
mechanism:
I'm developing a driver for a my servo motor controller. The interface
is via a PC parallel port. Only one RT thread is used that processes the
position feedback from the controller, and calculates the speed signa
