Maybe a workable solution to this conundrum would be for Chris to fork a
version of Stepconf into a new configurator (maybe called pyvcpConf or
something). Since forking (sub)projects is not only legal in GPL but
encouraged, Chris can add to his hearts content without stepping on Jeff's
vision or
Hi all,
I found the missing Python library, and now everything compiles fine without
specifying --disable-python. However I still get the following errors when
trying to run 'latency-test':
File "/home/emcadmin/emc2/bin/pyvcp", line 38, in
import vcpparse
File "/home/emcadmin/emc2/lib/python/v
Eric H. Johnson wrote:
>Jeff,
>
>Ok, got past that. Thanks. The next error is:
>
>Request region (378) failed
>Make sure the kernel module 'parport' is unloaded.
>
>I edited the configuration and set everything referencing parport to 'n'.
>There were six instances. After rebuilding I still get the
Jeff,
Ok, got past that. Thanks. The next error is:
Request region (378) failed
Make sure the kernel module 'parport' is unloaded.
I edited the configuration and set everything referencing parport to 'n'.
There were six instances. After rebuilding I still get the same error.
Regards,
Eric
I th
> It seems to this observer that what has happened recently centers around
> who wrote the original and the vision they had for it. As others saw
> potential for new abilities that piggybacked the earlier work there was
> a clash of vision.
>
This is indeed what has happened.
The originator
On Feb 4, 2009, at Feb 4, 2009--3:27 PM, alex.joni wrote:
> It's not actually removing things from pyvcp. Pyvcp still can do
> all the
> things it did a week ago.
> The question at hand was what to include into stepconf generated
> configs.
> (Note: stepconf is a utility which helps users to s
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 09:14 -0600, Jeff Epler wrote:
> When I wrote stepconf, my purpose was to reduce the amount of support
> required by a new user with a sherline-class machine before he can start
> to do basic milling tasks.
>
> I don't see this as fitting that goal.
It sounds like Jeff is c
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 08:37:16AM -0500, Eric H. Johnson wrote:
> Sebastian, et al,
>
> I don't know if you have been following the SMP threads, but I basically
> have EMC working on the Atom 330 with multi-processor support. When I pulled
> over my working configuration using the 7i43, I now get
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 05:38:47AM +, Chris Morley wrote:
> A) don't click it. (I know what you are saying - everyone will click it -
> but thats good see B)
>
> B) click it and find out how it works- don't like it or can't figure it out
> then unclick it. with almost no effort
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 08:18:47AM -0600, Ray Henry wrote:
> We really should be asking this questions of the EMC board -- of which
> Chris is but one member.
Different Chris...
I'm not involved in this one, except for a vague feeling of puzzlement
because I recall substantial discussion abou
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 11:58 +, paul_c wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 February 2009, Chris Morley wrote:
> > All valid points that could have been a good start to a discussion for
> > changes rather then deletion. The panel did not just have buttons
> > for offsets.
The EMC development community does
Sebastian, et al,
I don't know if you have been following the SMP threads, but I basically
have EMC working on the Atom 330 with multi-processor support. When I pulled
over my working configuration using the 7i43, I now get an error with
unknown symbols. After loadrt hm2_7i43... DMesg reports:
Un
> In regards of your particular case - Not everyone wants to be forced in to
> using one specific GUI. So if pyvcp offers something that has a more
> universal appeal, it should be worth considering.. On the flip side,
> if "duplication of functionality is forbidden", then I would take that as
>
Hi all,
I have an SMP kernel and rtai configuration with EMC sort of working. A
couple of issues remain, but I will be away from the machines for most of
the rest of the day. Here is a quick update.
1> EMC does compile and run if I use the --disable-python switch with
configure. Running without i
On Wednesday 04 February 2009, Chris Morley wrote:
> All valid points that could have been a good start to a discussion for
> changes rather then deletion. The panel did not just have buttons
> for offsets.
> I short note to me saying why you want to remove it and that you would
> entertain other i
15 matches
Mail list logo
