Re: [Emc-developers] detecting the availability of RT patched kernal

2010-02-21 Thread Jeff Epler
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 04:51:07AM +, Chris Morley wrote: > I don't see how I would need that feature, knowing that realtime is available > is enough, since having pncconf means you have EMC2. One common problem -- common enough that we added the test in the emc script itself -- is to boot the

Re: [Emc-developers] [Emc-commit] buildbot failure in EMC2 on master-checkin

2010-02-21 Thread Jeff Epler
Huh. This looks like a spurious failure, where 'realtime start' got impatient waiting for /dev/rtai_shm to be created (that's what the long spew of dots indicates). The runtests pass fine on my system. Jeff -- Download

[Emc-developers] CNC Workshop - EMC presence

2010-02-21 Thread Steve Stallings
The 2010 CNC Workshop is scheduled for 22-25 June. More details here: http://bbs.homeshopmachinist.net/forumdisplay.php?f=10 George Bulliss has asked me how many tables and power drops the EMC folks will need. I expect to be there as a vendor with a paid table. Jon Elson, do you plan to go as a v

Re: [Emc-developers] CNC Workshop - EMC presence

2010-02-21 Thread Jon Elson
Steve Stallings wrote: > The 2010 CNC Workshop is scheduled for 22-25 June. More > details here: > > http://bbs.homeshopmachinist.net/forumdisplay.php?f=10 > > George Bulliss has asked me how many tables and power > drops the EMC folks will need. I expect to be there as > a vendor with a paid table

Re: [Emc-developers] git workflow question

2010-02-21 Thread Chris Morley
> One answer that comes to mind is to remember this, and on the master > branch revert the commit after the merge that introduces it. > > X--o--A--o--o [v2.4_branch] > \\ > o--o--o--M--A' [master] > > X represents the place where we branched 2.4, A represents the change

Re: [Emc-developers] git workflow question

2010-02-21 Thread Jeff Epler
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 08:44:05PM +, Chris Morley wrote: > > > > > One answer that comes to mind is to remember this, and on the master > > branch revert the commit after the merge that introduces it. > > > > X--o--A--o--o [v2.4_branch] > > \\ > > o--o--o--M--A' [mas

Re: [Emc-developers] git workflow question

2010-02-21 Thread Chris Morley
> > The common ancestor of v2.4_branch and master is now Y, not X, so git > only considers changes from Y to Z at the next merge, so the problematic > commit A isn't in the list. (git determines this automatically I had hoped it was smart like that ! great > > > Truthfully I don't understand

Re: [Emc-developers] Stepconf shared limits and homes patch

2010-02-21 Thread Chris Morley
> Hello, > I created simple patch to allow stepconf to handle machines where > limit and home switches are shared for all axes. I am impressed with your ingenuity. Why is this feature important to you though? I probably mean what did you need the extra free pins for? > > Can someone check thi