Re: [Emc-developers] Documentation (call for review)

2011-01-27 Thread Alexey Starikovskiy
After a quick look over "Getting Started", I've noticed following: 1. '{0.5in}' markup still present, 2. markup of links is not cleared everywhere: [sub:, [cha:, etc 2. Table in 6.5 is broken Regards, Alex. On 01/27/2011 03:50 PM, Pavel Shramov wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 06:34:47PM +0300,

Re: [Emc-developers] Documentation (call for review)

2011-01-27 Thread Pavel Shramov
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 06:34:47PM +0300, Pavel Shramov wrote: > In the light of upcoming 2.5 version and new branch I want > to bring up again question about documentation format. This is call for bug hunting. I've done initial conversion of docs to asciidoc and created branch with new docs [1].

Re: [Emc-developers] gearchange comp

2011-01-27 Thread andy pugh
On 27 January 2011 17:50, Kirk Wallace wrote: > Just to be clear, I am _totally_ grateful for all of the software > available in EMC2, but if anyone is curious, I think it would be better > if the code was clear and concise enough that a person semi-skilled in C > could, with effort, figure out t

Re: [Emc-developers] gearchange comp

2011-01-27 Thread Kirk Wallace
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 10:26 +, andy pugh wrote: > On 27 January 2011 02:25, Kirk Wallace wrote: > > > I haven't seen any documentation on modparam. Does anyone have a link to > > more information? > > I don't think there is any documentation on "modparam" as part of a > comp module. > This i

Re: [Emc-developers] gearchange comp

2011-01-27 Thread andy pugh
On 27 January 2011 02:25, Kirk Wallace wrote: > I haven't seen any documentation on modparam. Does anyone have a link to > more information? I don't think there is any documentation on "modparam" as part of a comp module. This is possibly because it doesn't work particularly well. You can add a