[Emc-developers] Timestamp based velocity estimation. WAS: Re: Fanuc converter

2011-05-23 Thread Javier Ros
Hello, In the referred thread, there was a reference to "Timestamp based velocity estimation" Timestamp based velocity estimation improves this quite a bit (the software encoder, Mesa and Pico systems encoders all have this feature) But the timestamp velocity estimation signal/noise is limited b

Re: [Emc-developers] Timestamp based velocity estimation. WAS: Re: Fanuc converter

2011-05-23 Thread Peter C. Wallace
On Mon, 23 May 2011, Javier Ros wrote: Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:37:48 +0200 From: Javier Ros To: EMC developers Subject: [Emc-developers] Timestamp based velocity estimation. WAS: Re: Fanuc converter Hello, In the referred thread, there was a reference to "Timestamp based velocity estim

Re: [Emc-developers] Emc-developers Digest, Vol 61, Issue 10

2011-05-23 Thread Xuecheng Xi
Thanks. Anders's nice explanation for tcRunCycle() is very helpful. One question is that vs (vel suggested) could be possibly greater or equal to vc ( vel current), i.e., vs >= vc. That is true especially in the acceleration period. From your figure, it looks that vs is less than vc and line v

Re: [Emc-developers] Timestamp based velocity estimation. WAS: Re: Fanuc converter

2011-05-23 Thread Jon Elson
Javier Ros wrote: > > > > I'm curious about the concept. > Could you please elaborate a bit or refer to some bibliography?. Peter's reply is a good start. Let me add a bit. My universal PWM controller has also had this feature added (haven't got it put into my other products, yet.) There is a