Hi,
have a look to
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/emcinfo.pl?FPGA
and
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/emcinfo.pl?ARM
because of announcement of Zynq
(2xARM with FPGA + "Xilinx provides customers
with open-source Linux drivers ... for all the
processing peripherals..." in xcell75, page12).
I am working on a
On 16 June 2011 03:28, Jon Elson wrote:
> Before re-inventing the wheel, you should look at what devices are
> already available from
> Mesa and Pico Systems
I think that somebody is currently making themselves an interface
board based on their own hardware but running the Mesa Hostmot2
firmware
I ran your code on the 2.4 sim and after did a G53 G0 X0 Z0 and got what
I expected DRO read X0 Z0.
Next I did G0 Z1 and got Z0.0394 and sure enough I was still in G21 so I
did G20 then G0 Z1
and got what I expected the DRO read X0 Z1
John
andy pugh wrote:
> I have found a rather odd behaviour
On 16 June 2011 13:05, John Thornton wrote:
> Next I did G0 Z1 and got Z0.0394 and sure enough I was still in G21
That isn't right though, is it? Or does the DRO not change units with
G20/21 (I have never used the lathe in Imperial)
> so I
> did G20 then G0 Z1
> and got what I expected the DRO
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:14:49PM +0100, andy pugh wrote:
>
> That isn't right though, is it? Or does the DRO not change units with
> G20/21 (I have never used the lathe in Imperial)
No it does not change with G20/G21. You can change the DRO units
in the View menu.
--
On 16 June 2011 14:04, Chris Radek wrote:
> No it does not change with G20/G21. You can change the DRO units
> in the View menu.
OK.
So, John's 4.6 Sim doesn't show the problem, but my 4.6 sim does. That
seems very odd.
I did convert the 4.6 sim to metric for the purposes of the test, I
wonde
I used axis lathe sim and there no tool offsets for 3 or 4. I loaded
some random offsets for X and Z on tool 3 and 4 and ran the file again.
I switched the view to mm and did G0 Z1 and that is where it went.
John
andy pugh wrote:
> On 16 June 2011 13:05, John Thornton wrote:
>
>
>> Next I d
Hello Folks,
a few days ago I promised to set up a site with my work on the
RT_Preempt version of EMC together with patches.
The patch has the RT_Preempt patch from Michael Büsch and Jeff Eppler
already included. I also added and (hopefully) improved some things.
I had even less time on th
