Bugs item #3559152, was opened at 2012-08-17 19:47
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by cncdreamer
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=106744&aid=3559152&group_id=6744
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
On 8/17/2012 8:27 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 17 August 2012 20:12:35 Jon Elson did opine:
>
>
>>> On 17 August 2012 15:49, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>>
Also I believe, it would be valuable to have a discussion of the
various offerings, so that I for instance, who might ha
I still wonder if the Plan9 File System (which is now supported in the
Linux kernel) would be simpler. I will look into ZeroMQ to make sure I
understand the issues, but it being GPLv3-only may or may not be an
issue.
As for ini files not supporting types and dereferencing... I've
considered
Bugs item #3559147, was opened at 2012-08-17 18:45
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by cncdreamer
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=106744&aid=3559147&group_id=6744
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
On Friday 17 August 2012 20:12:35 Jon Elson did opine:
> > On 17 August 2012 15:49, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> Also I believe, it would be valuable to have a discussion of the
> >> various offerings, so that I for instance, who might have a need for
> >> tapping 40 each 6-32 to 10-32 holes to a dep
Am 17.08.2012 um 22:47 schrieb Jan de Kruyf:
Hi Jan,
> Michael, hallo.
> Here is a way out question:
> In a distributed system would you see your way clear to do the whole
> setup of a headless station from the database?
> I.e. store (pointers to) the specific HAL code, ini files, etc in the
> d
Michael, hallo.
Here is a way out question:
In a distributed system would you see your way clear to do the whole
setup of a headless station from the database?
I.e. store (pointers to) the specific HAL code, ini files, etc in the
database and distribute on power-up?
j.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:
Am 17.08.2012 um 19:03 schrieb Kenneth Lerman:
> On 8/17/2012 12:42 PM, Kent A. Reed wrote:
>> Don't take the lack of a hearty response from the developer community
> negatively. Most of us will speak up if we disagree.
>
> At any rate, using a database seems fine to me. A noSQL database seems
On 8/17/2012 1:03 PM, Kenneth Lerman wrote:
> Don't take the lack of a hearty response from the developer community
> negatively. Most of us will speak up if we disagree.
There's ample evidence for that! I said this somewhat tongue in cheek
but I said it because I have 45 years of experience with
On 8/17/2012 12:42 PM, Kent A. Reed wrote:
> didn't quote was "un"remarkable to me.>
>
> On 8/17/2012 1:04 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
>> how does that sound? anything essential missing?
> You've obviously thought about this much more deeply than I have. I was
> looking at it from my own experienc
On 8/17/2012 12:42 PM, Kent A. Reed wrote:
>> runtime dependency:
>
> I see in the redis issues list a recent entry about an anomalous high
> latency induced in clients when the server is frozen. I expect that is
> being addressed but a test that a server is present and healthy may be
> required
On 8/17/2012 1:04 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> how does that sound? anything essential missing?
You've obviously thought about this much more deeply than I have. I was
looking at it from my own experiences in a different distributed
application. After two readings, I think your reply sounds v
> On 17 August 2012 15:49, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
>
>> Also I believe, it would be valuable to have a discussion of the various
>> offerings, so that I for instance, who might have a need for tapping 40
>> each 6-32 to 10-32 holes to a depth of perhaps 1/2" occasionally, might
>> stand a chance
On Friday 17 August 2012 10:41:54 Dave Caroline did opine:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Friday 17 August 2012 09:30:45 andy pugh did opine:
> >> On 17 August 2012 13:48, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> >> > Some tapping heads will release after a set amount of extensio
On Friday 17 August 2012 10:15:07 andy pugh did opine:
> On 17 August 2012 15:49, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Also I believe, it would be valuable to have a discussion of the
> > various offerings, so that I for instance, who might have a need for
> > tapping 40 each 6-32 to 10-32 holes to a depth of
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 17 August 2012 09:30:45 andy pugh did opine:
>
>> On 17 August 2012 13:48, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>> > Some tapping heads will release after a set amount of extension of the
>> > head components. These heads also self reversed upon
On 17 August 2012 15:49, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Also I believe, it would be valuable to have a discussion of the various
> offerings, so that I for instance, who might have a need for tapping 40
> each 6-32 to 10-32 holes to a depth of perhaps 1/2" occasionally, might
> stand a chance of actually
On Friday 17 August 2012 09:30:45 andy pugh did opine:
> On 17 August 2012 13:48, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> > Some tapping heads will release after a set amount of extension of the
> > head components. These heads also self reversed upon axis retraction.
> > This allows the programmer to drive to
Me and Michale did do some work on this a while back.. see here
aimed at floating tapping.
http://git.mah.priv.at/gitweb/emc2-dev.git/commit/3b1c4f6a5bdd049cff17826d8ff000ff37a03fb3
and Rigth left have rigid cycle
http://git.mah.priv.at/gitweb/emc2-dev.git/commit/6f6d2645fe4d76f8f7d62ebed92fa84
Am 17.08.2012 um 14:03 schrieb andy pugh:
> On 17 August 2012 13:48, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>> Some tapping heads will release after a set amount of extension of the head
>> components. These heads also self reversed upon axis retraction.
>> This allows the programmer to drive to a position - d
On 17 August 2012 13:48, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> Some tapping heads will release after a set amount of extension of the head
> components. These heads also self reversed upon axis retraction.
> This allows the programmer to drive to a position - dwell to allow the head
> to reach extension and r
Some tapping heads will release after a set amount of extension of the head
components. These heads also self reversed upon axis retraction.
This allows the programmer to drive to a position - dwell to allow the head
to reach extension and release - reverse motion to retract the tap.
>
>
Tapping and die heads need the spindle to stop adancing into the work
some distance before the depth required,
the threading action continues to pull the holder out of the head till
it hits its trip point.
so set the depth by knowing where the tip point is
dwell time by your spindle speed from stop
On 17 August 2012 02:31, Chris Morley wrote:
> As I said I have never tried this, but I have read about it.
> I thought the whole point of the floating tapping head was so that the
> spindle and axis
> don't need to be synchronized.
I think that is the idea, but I don't see how you can have any
24 matches
Mail list logo
