Sounds good.
Dave
On 10/15/2012 7:19 PM, Victor Rocco wrote:
>> On 10/11/2012 6:13 AM, andy pugh wrote:
>>
>>> Ideally you would need to find someone with push-access to the
>>> repository who also has a modbus drive, and the time to test your
>>> component.
>>>
>>> Finding all three at the
>On 10/11/2012 6:13 AM, andy pugh wrote:
>> Ideally you would need to find someone with push-access to the
>> repository who also has a modbus drive, and the time to test your
>> component.
>>
>> Finding all three at the same time might be difficult.
>>
>> However, as your component is a standalone
On 10/15/2012 8:02 AM, Kent A. Reed wrote:
> Before I went on holiday I had followed in Charles' footsteps to build
> preempt-rt kernels and test them on several Intel and AMD boards. The
> latencies I got weren't very good (although not wildly out of line with
> oasdl postings) and certainly no
There is the hwlat program in rt-tools and debugfs/tracing which
will give max latencies.
Note that the OSADL values are not from userspace !
Atleast the way I read ther documentation on the testing, so from
userspace there will be a 'little' more jitter/latency .
Here is some on the lat
On 10/11/2012 2:12 AM, Lars Segerlund wrote:
> Me thinks latest preempt-rt is preferable fx. there is a patch
> that shaves 100 uS of the arm worstcase ... ( in the tty driver of all
> places ) ...
>
> The biggest problem with preempt-rt is the tuning, to get good
> results we should do a
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 08:54:21 -0400, Kent A. Reed wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 2:02 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
>
>> Lars brings up a good question, namely: which kernel base version to
>> use - the rt-preempt-integration and xenomai-integration branches are
>> underway
>
> Geez. I take my wife on a hol
On 10/11/2012 2:02 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> Lars brings up a good question, namely: which kernel base version to use -
> the rt-preempt-integration and xenomai-integration branches are underway
Geez. I take my wife on a holiday and you guys get busy.
Your "take" is in line with previous di
