Gene Heskett wrote:
> That came in handy at least once. Our place were somewhat hidden,
> up on a shelf above the road, and some bikers came up one day to have a
> party. Annie, my first wife, was a good instinct shooter. She stepped to
> the front door and told them to leave. The apparent
On Friday 31 May 2013 00:10:22 andy pugh did opine:
> On 30 May 2013 14:40, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > I sent a decent part of yesterday scribbling logic diagrams w/o coming
> > up with anything that looks like it would work. The truth tables
> > seem to be mutually exclusive.
>
> LUT5 is just a l
On Thursday 30 May 2013 23:03:04 dave did opine:
> On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 21:52 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Thursday 30 May 2013 21:36:43 andy pugh did opine:
> > > On 30 May 2013 14:40, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > > I sent a decent part of yesterday scribbling logic diagrams w/o
> > > > comin
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 21:52 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 30 May 2013 21:36:43 andy pugh did opine:
>
> > On 30 May 2013 14:40, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > I sent a decent part of yesterday scribbling logic diagrams w/o coming
> > > up with anything that looks like it would work. The tr
On Thursday 30 May 2013 21:36:43 andy pugh did opine:
> On 30 May 2013 14:40, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > I sent a decent part of yesterday scribbling logic diagrams w/o coming
> > up with anything that looks like it would work. The truth tables
> > seem to be mutually exclusive.
>
> LUT5 is just a
On 30 May 2013 16:04, andy pugh wrote:
> Straightforward, yes, but with 16 components, 3 inputs and one output
> per component, quite a bit of HAL to configure.
> Ah well, time to stop moaning and start coding I guess.
So I did that, and tested it here in both sim and realtime under
Lucid, then
On 4/2/2013 9:01 PM, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>Just a reminder about the week of June 17th. Give me an idea if you think
> you may come to Wichita that weekend. It would be nice to have an idea of
> how many could be here. I will set up for however many wish to be here.
> Looking fo
Don't feel bad, I did the same thing with a linux virtual machine
recently while working on
an OpenRisc project. -Lee
On 5/30/2013 10:44 AM, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> boot with "init=/bin/bash" in kernel line
> #mount -o remount,rw /
> #vi /etc/passwd
> remove 'x' from your user line -- this w
boot with "init=/bin/bash" in kernel line
#mount -o remount,rw /
#vi /etc/passwd
remove 'x' from your user line -- this will remove password
reboot
On 05/30/2013 09:37 PM, jeremy youngs wrote:
> just thinking about it i used my mill the other day and had set it up last
> yr first time since it war
just thinking about it i used my mill the other day and had set it up last
yr first time since it warmed up i got to use it . I have forgotten the
password, i have it set to start without one but cannot recall it after the
screen saver blanks me then i have to reboot . Obviously this is a concern
a
On 30 May 2013 16:24, Chris Radek wrote:
> Are you sure "owner" changes? I'm always seeing 6 on my sim build
> for the first thing loadrt~ed.
As far as I can see the "owner" is 6 on a sim-build and 2 on an RT build.
But it takes so long to do a back-to-back that I haven't tried a
proper A-B-A
On Thursday 30 May 2013 11:17:32 andy pugh did opine:
> On 30 May 2013 14:40, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > I sent a decent part of yesterday scribbling logic diagrams w/o coming
> > up with anything that looks like it would work. The truth tables
> > seem to be mutually exclusive.
>
> LUT5 is just a
On 30 May 2013 16:12, Chris Radek wrote:
> For this simple test, you could use "list pin" instead.
Which seem to be absent from:
http://www.linuxcnc.org/docs/html/man/man1/halrun.1.html
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
-
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:12:21AM -0500, Chris Radek wrote:
>
> For this simple test, you could use "list pin" instead.
Oh I misunderstood and thought you were testing pin creation. This
is stupid advice.
Are you sure "owner" changes? I'm always seeing 6 on my sim build
for the first thing lo
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 02:36:42AM +0100, andy pugh wrote:
>
> The test just sets up one of each type of mux (16 variants), sets the
> inputs, does a "show pin", sets the selector bit, and "show pin"
> again.
For this simple test, you could use "list pin" instead.
---
On 30 May 2013 15:59, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> Take a look at the test for the multiclick component, it uses halsampler
> and halstreamer. It sets up a small HAL network with streamer connected
> to the component's input pins and sampler connected to the output pins,
> then streams in test p
On 5/29/13 19:36 , andy pugh wrote:
> In a fit of enthusiasm I set up a regression test for mux_generic.
> (which is otherwise all ready to push).
>
> The test just sets up one of each type of mux (16 variants), sets the
> inputs, does a "show pin", sets the selector bit, and "show pin"
> again.
>
On 30 May 2013 14:40, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I sent a decent part of yesterday scribbling logic diagrams w/o coming up
> with anything that looks like it would work. The truth tables seem to be
> mutually exclusive.
LUT5 is just a lookup, not a truth table, so every possible
combination of input
On Thursday 30 May 2013 09:26:11 Gene Heskett did opine:
> Greetings everybody;
>
> I have the power logic all hooked up and working in both directions now,
> but no stop interlocking to prevent a premature on state while its still
> spinning the other other direction, yet.
>
> And I have added
19 matches
Mail list logo
