On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Chris Radek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 03:20:03PM -0500, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> >
> > The idea is basically to pack the relevant parts of the interpreter's
> > active state into a minimal size "tag", and stick this tag onto every
> > motion command.
>
> T
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 03:20:03PM -0500, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
>
> The idea is basically to pack the relevant parts of the interpreter's
> active state into a minimal size "tag", and stick this tag onto every
> motion command.
This is great! It's just how we handled the override enables.
>
Hi All,
I've been doing some work on making the "Active G-Codes" display match
between the running program and what's displayed in the GUI. I have a
branch off of 2.7 with my solution to this problem:
https://github.com/robEllenberg/linuxcnc-mirror/tree/feature/state-tags-2.7
The idea is basical
