On 04/14/2015 05:46 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 14 April 2015 at 23:26, TJoseph Powderly wrote:
>> yes, seems true.
>> i hope your view of the time sale for reversals is
>> at most millisecs. the immediate velocity has nothing to do with the
>> previous, there is no velocity smoothing.
>
> I remain
On 14 April 2015 at 23:26, TJoseph Powderly wrote:
> yes, seems true.
> i hope your view of the time sale for reversals is
> at most millisecs. the immediate velocity has nothing to do with the
> previous, there is no velocity smoothing.
I remain confused by this.
If adaptive feed went from +1 on
g30 & g30.1?
interesting when combines with retract
and i see the intermediate point would be easy
( the rufpoint might be an intermediate point from
the cone surface towards the startpoint above the workpiece.
i really have to do some drawings :|
thx for the reminder about G30
tomp tjtr33
On 04/
On 04/14/2015 11:02 AM, andy pugh wrote:
sorry andy still working my way thru these posts, and i am slow
> On 11 April 2015 at 16:13, TJoseph Powderly wrote:
>
>> You may find that the adaptive feedrate idea is very wrong for edm.
>
> I think that the adaptive feed pin was introduced for wire ED
Robert,
thanks for looking into it
On 04/14/2015 10:17 AM, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
Very interesting stuff! I have some ideas for how to implement a more
EDM-appropriate reverse run mechanism based on what you describe. Here's a
short list of new features we would need to address your concerns
1
Andy, I agree, they are two separate problems. I just wanted to answer both
questions in one place since they came up here.
My G15/G16 example is very similar to G28 and G30, but the difference would
be that the retract would happen immediately and automatically on abort of
a program (vs at a part
On 14 April 2015 at 16:17, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> 1) "Retract-to-setpoint-on-abort" modal code. If a retract point is set,
> the machine would automatically retract to that position on abort. Abort
> would also clear this set point.
>
> Perhaps this pair of G codes could work (chosen somewhat
On 11 April 2015 at 16:13, TJoseph Powderly wrote:
> You may find that the adaptive feedrate idea is very wrong for edm.
I think that the adaptive feed pin was introduced for wire EDM, and if
it doesn't work properly for that then it ought to change.
> so, imo the adaptive feed is incorrect
> i
Very interesting stuff! I have some ideas for how to implement a more
EDM-appropriate reverse run mechanism based on what you describe. Here's a
short list of new features we would need to address your concerns
1) "Retract-to-setpoint-on-abort" modal code. If a retract point is set,
the machine wo
On 14 April 2015 at 13:43, John Thornton wrote:
> I'd think those pages should point to the main page.
What is the "main page" now? The link on the web front page links to
an email on Gmane. Which seems a bit of a strange way to do it.
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.if
I'd think those pages should point to the main page. I guess if your
trying to work with an older computer you might want the old LiveCD to
start with...
JT
On 4/14/2015 7:16 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> We occasionally see potential new users of LinuxCNC following the
> instructions here:
> http://w
We occasionally see potential new users of LinuxCNC following the
instructions here:
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Installing_LinuxCNC
And ending up with a 2.5 installation. Or occasionally even here:
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Installing_EMC2
And ending up with a 2.4 versi
12 matches
Mail list logo
