Am 19.07.2016 um 02:34 schrieb Chris Morley:
>
>
>
> From: John Kasunich
> Sent: July 18, 2016 8:19 PM
> To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] JA - Why does motion mode change from world to
> teleop, when I change to manual mode
Am 18.07.2016 um 23:42 schrieb Moses McKnight:
>
> On 07/18/2016 04:19 PM, EBo wrote:
>> On Jul 18 2016 3:09 PM, Moses McKnight wrote:
>>> On 07/18/2016 03:19 PM, John Kasunich wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016, at 03:28 PM, Chris Morley wrote:
> I think the whole mode thing needs to be loo
Am 18.07.2016 um 23:41 schrieb Sebastian Kuzminsky:
> On 07/18/2016 02:19 PM, John Kasunich wrote:
>> I agree with Niemand that LinuxCNC should not switch to
>> joint mode without an explicit operator request. All of the
>> use cases I can think of for individual joint movement
>> need care on the
On Monday 18 July 2016 18:19:05 andy pugh wrote:
> On 18 July 2016 at 21:02, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Has this got anything to do with losing the MDI modes multicommand
> > buffer as I described in a previous message?
>
> No, not related.
>
> The MDI buffer thing is fixed:
> http://git.linuxcnc.or
From: John Kasunich
Sent: July 18, 2016 8:19 PM
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] JA - Why does motion mode change from world to
teleop, when I change to manual mode
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016, at 03:28 PM, Chris Morley wrote:
On 18 July 2016 at 21:02, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Has this got anything to do with losing the MDI modes multicommand buffer
> as I described in a previous message?
No, not related.
The MDI buffer thing is fixed:
http://git.linuxcnc.org/gitweb?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commit;h=64d79849c69cf0cf200721a29292a
On 07/18/2016 02:19 PM, John Kasunich wrote:
> I agree with Niemand that LinuxCNC should not switch to
> joint mode without an explicit operator request. All of the
> use cases I can think of for individual joint movement
> need care on the part of the operator. Dropping him into
> joint mode une
On 07/18/2016 04:19 PM, EBo wrote:
> On Jul 18 2016 3:09 PM, Moses McKnight wrote:
>> On 07/18/2016 03:19 PM, John Kasunich wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016, at 03:28 PM, Chris Morley wrote:
I think the whole mode thing needs to be looked at.Needing to
switch to mdi to do ma
On Jul 18 2016 3:09 PM, Moses McKnight wrote:
> On 07/18/2016 03:19 PM, John Kasunich wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016, at 03:28 PM, Chris Morley wrote:
>>>
>>> I think the whole mode thing needs to be looked at.Needing to
>>> switch to mdi to do manual things like touch off and tool changes i
On 07/18/2016 03:19 PM, John Kasunich wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016, at 03:28 PM, Chris Morley wrote:
>>
>> I think the whole mode thing needs to be looked at.Needing to switch to mdi
>> to do manual things like touch off and tool changes is annoying when
>> building a gui.
>> Why do we need
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016, at 03:28 PM, Chris Morley wrote:
>
> I think the whole mode thing needs to be looked at.Needing to switch to mdi
> to do manual things like touch off and tool changes is annoying when building
> a gui.
> Why do we need separate modes? That is left over from legacy NC mach
On Monday 18 July 2016 14:11:06 Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 07/18/2016 11:19 AM, Niemand Sonst wrote:
> > OK, I think I found the problem, but I will need help to solve this
> > issue! I do not know C++, sorry:
> >
> > Please take a look at emc/task/emctask.cc
> > around line 223
> >
> > switc
I think the whole mode thing needs to be looked at.Needing to switch to mdi to
do manual things like touch off and tool changes is annoying when building a
gui.
Why do we need separate modes? That is left over from legacy NC machines.
It is restrictive and error prone.
I think as much as possibl
On 07/18/2016 01:29 PM, Niemand Sonst wrote:
> Am 18.07.2016 um 20:11 schrieb Sebastian Kuzminsky:
>> On 07/18/2016 11:19 AM, Niemand Sonst wrote:
>>> OK, I think I found the problem, but I will need help to solve this issue!
>>> I do not know C++, sorry:
>>>
>>> Please take a look at emc/task/emct
Am 18.07.2016 um 20:11 schrieb Sebastian Kuzminsky:
> On 07/18/2016 11:19 AM, Niemand Sonst wrote:
>> OK, I think I found the problem, but I will need help to solve this issue!
>> I do not know C++, sorry:
>>
>> Please take a look at emc/task/emctask.cc
>> around line 223
>>
>> switching to EMC_TAS
On 07/18/2016 11:19 AM, Niemand Sonst wrote:
> OK, I think I found the problem, but I will need help to solve this issue!
> I do not know C++, sorry:
>
> Please take a look at emc/task/emctask.cc
> around line 223
>
> switching to EMC_TASK_MODE_MANUAL sets the trajectory mode to
> EMC_TRAJ_MODE_FRE
OK, I think I found the problem, but I will need help to solve this issue!
I do not know C++, sorry:
Please take a look at emc/task/emctask.cc
around line 223
switching to EMC_TASK_MODE_MANUAL sets the trajectory mode to
EMC_TRAJ_MODE_FREE
IMHO that should not be this way, if we come back from
17 matches
Mail list logo
