Re: [Emc-developers] Tool Number limit

2016-11-01 Thread dragon
Thanks for checking... On 11/01/2016 11:50 AM, andy pugh wrote: > On 1 November 2016 at 16:13, dragon wrote: >> Do you remember who you worked with at Tormach? > > Actually, looking back, it was someone at zbot that Tormach put me in > touch with. > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digita

Re: [Emc-developers] Tool Number limit

2016-11-01 Thread andy pugh
On 1 November 2016 at 16:13, dragon wrote: > Do you remember who you worked with at Tormach? Actually, looking back, it was someone at zbot that Tormach put me in touch with. -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed for the especial use of mechanical geniu

Re: [Emc-developers] Tool Number limit

2016-11-01 Thread dragon
Andy, I just looked at these two links. I REALLY like what you started here. If you are open to my thoughts I will find some time in the next couple of days to flesh out some further ideas and directions for this. I think you made a great start. Do you remember who you worked with at Tormach? I w

Re: [Emc-developers] Tool Number limit

2016-11-01 Thread dragon
Personally I think that an interface and possible backing DB to tie gcode, tools, and machines together is a great idea but should definitely be separate from the tool table. It is an edge case and while many users make use of the tool table, including those that do not even have ATCs, there are fa