[Emc-developers] Slightly wacky docs proposal

2019-06-11 Thread andy pugh
If we were to rename all the .txt asciidoc files to .adoc then they would be automatically rendered in Github in pretty form. This would make it far easier for contributors to make simple edits and see the results. Is this worth doing? -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachm

Re: [Emc-developers] Slightly wacky docs proposal

2019-06-11 Thread John Thornton
Dang it I pressed the wrong reply button... Will the docs still build after changing the extension? Or does the doc building need changes as well? JT On 6/11/2019 7:20 AM, andy pugh wrote: If we were to rename all the .txt asciidoc files to .adoc then they would be automatically rendered in

Re: [Emc-developers] Slightly wacky docs proposal

2019-06-11 Thread andy pugh
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 14:12, John Thornton wrote: > > Will the docs still build after changing the extension? Or does the doc > building need changes as well? https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/3d67d4d2472f46db2dbc0c6a7d1b96e7b342fa7c/docs/src/Submakefile Seems to imply that every file

Re: [Emc-developers] Slightly wacky docs proposal

2019-06-11 Thread Joe Hildreth
John, While on the topic of documentation, did you resolve the issue of building the docs when compiling not being merged into a single document like the online docs? I think we discussed it on the IRC channel while I was doing test compiles under Lubuntu 18.04. Joe - On Jun 11, 2019, at

Re: [Emc-developers] Slightly wacky docs proposal

2019-06-11 Thread John Thornton
I did a short test and it's an all or nothing type of change "I think", for sure you can't just change one and have it build. I did see some areas of the submakefile that would have to be changed as well. Changing one and the build fails. JT On 6/11/2019 8:24 AM, andy pugh wrote: On Tue, 11

Re: [Emc-developers] Slightly wacky docs proposal

2019-06-11 Thread John Thornton
Changing every .txt to .adoc and renaming the submakefile fails to build. I pushed a branch github-docs with those changes if you want to take a look at it. JT On 6/11/2019 8:24 AM, andy pugh wrote: On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 14:12, John Thornton wrote: Will the docs still build after changing

Re: [Emc-developers] trying to make a buildbot out of my sheldon's pi3b

2019-06-11 Thread Jon Elson
On 06/10/2019 09:39 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: On Monday 10 June 2019 09:43:25 pm Jon Elson wrote: On 06/10/2019 04:42 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: fatal: fsync error on '/media/slash/buildbot/linuxcnc-dev/.git/objects/pack/tmp_pack_dREvW b': Input/output error Yikes, that may indicate a bad memory d

Re: [Emc-developers] Slightly wacky docs proposal

2019-06-11 Thread andy pugh
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 16:36, John Thornton wrote: > I did see some > areas of the submakefile that would have to be changed as well. Ah, yes. https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/3d67d4d2472f46db2dbc0c6a7d1b96e7b342fa7c/docs/src/Submakefile#L461 For example has an explicit %.txt I don't