If we were to rename all the .txt asciidoc files to .adoc then they would
be automatically rendered in Github in pretty form.
This would make it far easier for contributors to make simple edits and see
the results.
Is this worth doing?
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachm
Dang it I pressed the wrong reply button...
Will the docs still build after changing the extension? Or does the doc
building need changes as well?
JT
On 6/11/2019 7:20 AM, andy pugh wrote:
If we were to rename all the .txt asciidoc files to .adoc then they would
be automatically rendered in
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 14:12, John Thornton wrote:
>
> Will the docs still build after changing the extension? Or does the doc
> building need changes as well?
https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/3d67d4d2472f46db2dbc0c6a7d1b96e7b342fa7c/docs/src/Submakefile
Seems to imply that every file
John,
While on the topic of documentation, did you resolve the issue of building the
docs when compiling not being merged into a single document like the online
docs? I think we discussed it on the IRC channel while I was doing test
compiles under Lubuntu 18.04.
Joe
- On Jun 11, 2019, at
I did a short test and it's an all or nothing type of change "I think",
for sure you can't just change one and have it build. I did see some
areas of the submakefile that would have to be changed as well. Changing
one and the build fails.
JT
On 6/11/2019 8:24 AM, andy pugh wrote:
On Tue, 11
Changing every .txt to .adoc and renaming the submakefile fails to
build. I pushed a branch github-docs with those changes if you want to
take a look at it.
JT
On 6/11/2019 8:24 AM, andy pugh wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 14:12, John Thornton wrote:
Will the docs still build after changing
On 06/10/2019 09:39 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 10 June 2019 09:43:25 pm Jon Elson wrote:
On 06/10/2019 04:42 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
fatal: fsync error on
'/media/slash/buildbot/linuxcnc-dev/.git/objects/pack/tmp_pack_dREvW
b': Input/output error
Yikes, that may indicate a bad memory d
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 16:36, John Thornton wrote:
> I did see some
> areas of the submakefile that would have to be changed as well.
Ah, yes.
https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/3d67d4d2472f46db2dbc0c6a7d1b96e7b342fa7c/docs/src/Submakefile#L461
For example has an explicit %.txt
I don't