Could probably do this (tool-by-name) with params: #facetool = 3
Would be friendlier if you could enter that in the tooldata base
From: Feral Engineer
Sent: June 22, 2022 3:13 AM
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] tool database in python
Those masso
Le mer. 22 juin 2022 à 00:32, andy pugh a écrit :
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 20:57, Jérémie Tarot wrote:
>
>
> The T-number can be the pocket number if you want to run your query
> that way. But it's a very bad choice for a random toolchanger.
>
Good point! 🤔...
But then it is a CAM thing too bec
Those masso wanks still don't have tool radius comp
I would like to see a wear comp along with cutter radius/diameter, while
we're on that subject. Also, as Jeremie mentioned, Siemens controls allow
you to call up a tool by number: T6 M6 or by name: T="My Tool". Similar
functionality would also be
Simple Tool Changer on mill,
The pocket number IS the tool number loaded into the spindle.
An M06/M6 command then puts the spindle tool in the correct pot and the
machine waits for the next tool pot number to be positioned to allow the
spindle to be loaded.
Machines with a tool change rack or a ca
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 20:57, Jérémie Tarot wrote:
> > So, the tool _number_ as associated with the G-code T-command is very
> > deliberately _not_ a key but a "property."
> I think that number is really a pocket_id in a tool_magazine to which is
> associated a tool_id, which in turn has a tool_
On 18/6/22 1:47, andy pugh wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 at 17:07, Jose Luis wrote:
Still need to figure the parts from linuxcnc like where i can get or put
the data.
Dewey added an interface. I'll be honest and say that it isn't how I
would have done it. But I didn't do it so
https://linu
Le lun. 20 juin 2022 à 10:26, andy pugh a écrit :
> On Sun, 19 Jun 2022 at 08:35, Håvard F. Aasen via Emc-developers
> wrote:
>
>
> You have to bear in mind how the tools are called up from the G-code.
>
> M6 T6
>
> There is only a single integer passed to whatever selects the tool.
>
Anyone wh
On 6/21/22 15:25, Jérémie Tarot wrote:
Le lun. 20 juin 2022 à 07:39, Rod Webster a
écrit :
Once you have a unique primary key, there is no need to enforce uniqueness
on other fields. But in many cases it is a good idea.
Agreed
I would not make this
user definable as you are talking about
Le lun. 20 juin 2022 à 07:39, Rod Webster a
écrit :
> Once you have a unique primary key, there is no need to enforce uniqueness
> on other fields. But in many cases it is a good idea.
Agreed
I would not make this
> user definable as you are talking about the database structure which should
>
