On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 at 15:51, Steffen Möller via Emc-developers
wrote:
> Is there any way for us to have runtime tests for any such limits?
> Simulation, I presume. But how far away are we?
The caps are applied to the HAL pins, so it should be trivial to test.
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle
To me this is a clear indication that we need a backport of LinuxCNC for
Debian 12. I will address that right after the release of Debian 13
(scheduled for August 9th).
Is there any way for us to have runtime tests for any such limits?
Simulation, I presume. But how far away are we?
I do not f
I went back to 2.9.0~pre that is in Debian 12 and reverse works but
forward does not cap the speeds. I would suggest changing the wording in
the docs in updating linuxcnc from 2.8x to 2.9.y to 2.8 to 2.9.1 and
later to be more specific that it only works with 2.9.1 or later. This
may be where I
Now I'm really confused as to why it didn't cap the values because it
works this morning for all 4 ini items on Axis 2.9.1.
Sorry for the static.
JT
On 7/21/25 18:11, andy pugh wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 at 14:23, John Thornton wrote:
Is this only in master and the docs are wrong or is thi
https://nanobind.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html
Hello,
This one goes out to Rene in particular, who just proposed a semi-automation of
Python bindings with pybind11. Now, this nanobind development seems to
outperform it rather drastically. How are you all's feelings about it?
nanobind is
