an totravel
> but it went belly up as soon as it tried to analyze a sample ofrock it dug
> up. The time allowed for one of the analytic processeswas not enough to
> complete the process and a real-time "priorityinversion" brought the whole
> rover to near death. Fortu
I agree that the design of the protocols and software needs to accomadate
2,000,000 steps /sec
64000 counts per rev on the encoders is also needed with the 2Meg cnts/sec
These max paramitors will determin our number systems.
I have a laser cutting table that will support 2,000,000steps/sec with
x if I can just run the rtos direct.
Thank You.
Daniel
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Elson"
To: "EMC developers"
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] EMC3 definition
> Daniel Lee wrote:
>> If we allow for a hartbeat be
run the code on that PC as well as a desktop.
Daniel
Daniel Lee wrote:
>
> I find that using a PC for stepping is fine for low speed stepping. I
> need a device that can handle smooth stepping as well as servo upgrades.
> The current EMC2 can not handle my needs of speed, smo
editing while the
machine is in operation. Harddrive, usb RS232 port operation and video updates
while running cause irregular stepping at high stepping speeds
with the current design.
If this sounds like a project to start and to define the next generation of EMC
I would like to help.
Daniel Lee
