Good to know, Ebo. I obviously didn't dig very hard. Thanks,
Regards,
Kent
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Javier Ros wrote:
> The kinematics module in some examples, in particular when dealing with the
> direct kinematics, needs to solve a Newton-Raphson proccedure;
> to that end there is a primitive solver, along some others to do matrix
> products et al.
>
> So I th
Point of information:
Issue #2---review and merge new RTOS branch
Which branch on the repository is the new RTOS branch?
Regards,
Kent
--
Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that
develo
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 10/29/13 01:11 , Chris Morley wrote:
> > Just curious on the position we are at with UB and 2.6 status.
> > I haven't heard much lately and just want to make sure my
> > work stays in step with possible release schedule.
>
> We have
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> I gave a talk on the Portable RTAPI as implemented in the Unified Binary
> branch of LinuxCNC. It was attended by some 40-50 people.
>
> Alex Rössler joined me with his MendelMax 3D printer and gave several
> well-attended demonstrations s
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Kent A. Reed wrote:
> <...>
> Funny, though, I didn't get a hit on lines 657 and 668 in this file
> grep'ping on 'G10 L2'. Aha! We know what that means. Sure enough, there are
> multiple nonbreaking spaces in line 657 and in line 668. The multiple
> occurrences acc
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Jeff Epler wrote:
> When I looked into this, it appeared to be a bug already reported in
> debian
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622359
>
> I did not find a suitable workaround. But there is a new workaround
> suggested since the last time I
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> src/emc has some 56 references to fields called 'heartbeat', but its
> unclear what the intent and semantics are - AFAICT the only using code is
> in xemc.cc where it is used for some kind of change detection.
>
> Any idea what that field
Gentle persons:
Gene Heskett asked earlier this month on emc-users if "the" server
(presumably he meant git.linuxnc.org since he mentioned an update) were
under attack because he was getting ca 20kb/s transfer speeds instead of
his usual ca 380kb/s.
I wasn't interested in the abnormality (speed s
On Aug 11, 2013 6:03 PM, "Charles Steinkuehler"
wrote:
>
> On 8/11/2013 4:22 PM, sam sokolik wrote:
> > At the fest when they where working on the mazak - Jeff E was
> > alt-tabbing between 2 windows and the machine was going Thud - Thud -
> > Thud each time. (finally JMK yelled at him to stop :)
Addendum:
dpkg-checkbuilddeps fails on this distribution with the pithy comment
"dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: syntax error in debian/control at line 19:
block lacks the 'Package' field"
There's an extraneous blank line in the file debian/control at line 19
which caused dpkg-checkbuilddeps to beli
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 07/25/2013 08:09 PM, sam sokolik wrote:
> > when building on 12.04 - I use
> >
> > sudo apt-get install build-essential autoconf libpth-dev libglib2.0-dev
> > libgtk2.0-dev tcl-dev tk-dev bwidget libreadline-dev python-tk
> > python
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:39 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 22 July 2013 09:47, TJoseph Powderly wrote:
>
> >> would you know where the source files for linuxcnc.so?
> >> (imported by LinuxCNCWebSktSvr.py )
> >
> > have not found this ^^^ yet
>
> I _think_ this is src / emc / usr_intf / axis / extens
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
>
> <...>
> RFP: I suggest we switch all build/install documentation of any kind to
> in-repository documentation (manual) proper, the Wiki method is just asking
> for trouble with outdated information
>
>
>
I strongly support this proposal
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I just discovered that main website of the project seems strange:
> if I type address www.linuxcnc.org in address bar, I see this:
> http://picpaste.com/ok-sHrM9Epp.png
> which seems ok
>
> if I type linuxcnc.org in address bar, w
I am essentially out of loop (I'm in the hospital cafeteria at the moment)
as we struggle to to halt my wife's precipitous decline but I can't stop
myself responding to this. I know I have archived one or more EMC tar files
at home, probably labelled by me as 'emc1' to keep things straight. As far
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Peter Jensen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Matt Shaver pinged me that I should post an update on Rockhopper, Little
> Penguin and Emperor (all projects named after penguin types, in case you're
> not up on your penguin trivia).
>
> <...>
> As for a network-based interface
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings Guys;
>
> Someone mentioned that rockhopper can make .pdf
> s somehow, and those of coarse can be scaled.
>
> Since I now own an HL3170CDW color laser printer, what steps does it take
> to do this, blowing my lathe .hal file up into
Gentle persons:
In a previous message, I mentioned a "package require LInuxcnc" error
message that stumped me for a bit last night.
Let me elaborate.
Running Michael's distribution on my BeagleBone Black. When I logged in
last night, it helpfully reported "environment set up for
linuxcnc-pru-emc
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 5:35 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 4 June 2013 10:13, Michael Haberler wrote:
>
> > Until we have that - an appeal to folks asking questions: please
> consider the fact that developers dont stand behind you, and dont have a
> crystal ball or telepathic qualities.
>
> Oh yes. T
This thread would be more interesting if it still addressed either "dynamic
braking" or "LinuxCNC".
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:59 AM, dave wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 04:33 -0600, EBo wrote:
> > On May 31 2013 3:46 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> > > On 31 May 2013 04:39, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >> T
Hey, Matt. Don't get me wrong. I think LCNC deserves a better documented
history. I just don't want to see discussion about moving forward bog down
in "it's the way it is now because..." loops. It's important to know one's
history but it's also important not to let it paralyze the process. I got a
22 matches
Mail list logo
