is it not debian TESTING that currently has 7i92S support (bookworm) due
for stable release probably September 2023 (12 months away at present from
stable)?
I've not got a 7i92S but it makes sense or some way to get LCNC to work
with the most available boards currently available.
But it may mean
I'll join, did not know it was happening
rob / robertspark
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022, 18:05 gene heskett, wrote:
> On Friday, 10 June 2022 11:00:22 EDT Steffen Möller wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I waited a bit long, sorry for that. Numbers have not increased much,
> > but anyway it should be a fun t
I notice that buildbot is pushing for a migration to python3, and linuxcncs
buildbot runs python 2.7
could it be this that is the issue
http://buildbot.linuxcnc.org/buildbot/about
http://buildbot.net/
On Mon, 3 Jan 2022, 00:59 Phill Carter, wrote:
> Buildbot seems to not want to leave 202
is there any merit in trying to Google translate the current docs to other
languages?
On Tue, 17 Aug 2021, 13:23 andy pugh, wrote:
> The French docs are so out of date that they have become misleading.
>
> They are probably worse than useless. For example the "Getting
> LinuxCNC" describes Ubunt
time) until all the dialog is gone / cleared.
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 at 09:08, Rene Hopf via Emc-developers <
emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>
> > On 11. Aug 2021, at 10:04, Rob C wrote:
> >
> > Could it be:
> > ImportError: No module named hal
>
Could it be:
ImportError: No module named hal
Therefore have you installed python3, given master has now changed to
Python3, this may (will) also require GTK2 to become GTK3 and some of the
dependencies will need to be located in the python3 dependencies folder and
not within the python2 fol
couple of options...
switch to another offset (g59) and that may provide you with the machine
coordinates, given they are not likely to be offset from m53 except if
G91 temp offset has been applied, in which case you could subtract g92 from
g59 and it "should" (never tried it and not near a ma
