2010/2/28 Jeff Epler mailto:jep...@unpythonic.net>>
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 04:40:24PM +0100, Slavko Kocjancic wrote:
> Machine seems to work ok but report is way wrong!
>
> User step type has 7 phases and 8 steps per cycle! THAT's WRONG
> I think should be
> User st
I think it would be wiser to modify it for full 8 bits, which can be masked
down to less bits of output easily.
But there would need to be change in the generator too, so that it would go
by more than 1 step at a time when needed, and when going even faster the
generator would output only 4 states
2010/2/28 Jeff Epler
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 04:40:24PM +0100, Slavko Kocjancic wrote:
> > Machine seems to work ok but report is way wrong!
> >
> > User step type has 7 phases and 8 steps per cycle! THAT's WRONG
> > I think should be
> > User step type has 3 phases and 8 steps per cycle!
>
> O
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 04:40:24PM +0100, Slavko Kocjancic wrote:
> Machine seems to work ok but report is way wrong!
>
> User step type has 7 phases and 8 steps per cycle! THAT's WRONG
> I think should be
> User step type has 3 phases and 8 steps per cycle!
OK, I corrected this. Besides this p
Jeff Epler pravi:
> Slavko Kocjancic wanted a custom step type for his homemade stepper
> driver. This adds a (single) customizable step waveform. These
> waveforms have the same limitations as the existing ones: up to 5 output
> phases, and up to 10 steps per cycle
> ---
> I'm sorry the earlier
Slavko Kocjancic wanted a custom step type for his homemade stepper
driver. This adds a (single) customizable step waveform. These
waveforms have the same limitations as the existing ones: up to 5 output
phases, and up to 10 steps per cycle
---
I'm sorry the earlier patch didn't apply--I am carry
