[Emc-developers] Git lost

2019-07-19 Thread Phillip Carter
I am working on 2.8 locally, I have: Pulled from origin Modified some files Committed Tested Switched to 2.8 Pulled from origin Merged 2.8 Now there are commits that I am not sure belong in master I am not sure where to go from here. ___ Emc-developer

Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost

2019-07-19 Thread andy pugh
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 08:01, Phillip Carter wrote: > I am working on 2.8 locally, I have: > Pulled from origin > Modified some files > Committed > Tested > Switched to 2.8 > Pulled from origin > Merged 2.8 > Now there are commits that I am not sure belong in master > Should one of those 2.8s be

Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost

2019-07-19 Thread Phillip Carter
Oops, yes, after Tested should be Switched to master.Cheers, Phill Original message From: andy pugh Date: 19/7/19 7:27 pm (GMT+10:00) To: EMC developers Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 08:01, Phillip Carter wrote:> I am working on 2.8 loca

Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost

2019-07-19 Thread andy pugh
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 10:54, Phillip Carter wrote: > Oops, yes, after Tested should be Switched to master OK, so you are about to merge some changes that are in 2.8, not in master, and were not made by you. I think that is probably OK. The norm in LinuxCNC is to put changes in the earliest br

Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost

2019-07-19 Thread Phillip Carter
> On 20 Jul 2019, at 12:13 am, andy pugh wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 10:54, Phillip Carter > wrote: > >> Oops, yes, after Tested should be Switched to master > > > OK, so you are about to merge some changes that are in 2.8, not in master, > and were not made by you. > Correct > I t

Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost

2019-07-19 Thread andy pugh
On Sat, 20 Jul 2019 at 00:35, Phillip Carter wrote: What happens in the case that something was meant for 2.8 but not for > master, how is that prevented from being merged up in the future? That's a very good question. And one to which I wish I had the answer -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle

Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost

2019-07-19 Thread Chris Morley
cific-commits-when-merging Chris From: Phillip Carter Sent: July 19, 2019 11:33 PM To: linuxcnc-developers Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost > On 20 Jul 2019, at 12:13 am, andy pugh wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 10:54, Phillip Carter > wrot

Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost

2019-07-19 Thread Phillip Carter
ts-when-merging > > Chris > > > From: Phillip Carter > Sent: July 19, 2019 11:33 PM > To: linuxcnc-developers > Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost > > > >> On 20 Jul 2019, at 12:13 am, andy pugh wrote: >> >> On Fri, 19 Jul 2019

Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost

2019-07-19 Thread Chris Morley
r own code. Chris From: Phillip Carter Sent: July 20, 2019 12:02 AM To: linuxcnc-developers Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost Sorry, I don’t want to actually do this. I was just asking the question because I saw all those commits and I wasn’t sure what

Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost

2019-07-19 Thread Phillip Carter
icate merges later.. > > Now you can see why it's nice when a committer merges things right away so > they can deal with their own code. > > Chris > > > From: Phillip Carter > Sent: July 20, 2019 12:02 AM > To: linuxcnc-developers &

Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost

2019-07-19 Thread Chris Morley
If it's just Roberts's stuff in 2.8 you are worried about - it seems to merge cleanly to master - go for it. Chris From: Phillip Carter Sent: July 20, 2019 12:02 AM To: linuxcnc-developers Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost Sorry, I don

Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost

2019-07-19 Thread Phillip Carter
p Carter > Sent: July 20, 2019 12:02 AM > To: linuxcnc-developers > Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Git lost > > Sorry, I don’t want to actually do this. > > I was just asking the question because I saw all those commits and I wasn’t > sure what to do. > > I real