On Sep 16 2013 4:29 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 12 September 2013 02:27, Jeff Epler wrote:
>
>> I personally prefer that each individual file have a copyright
>> notice
>> and license grant where possible, because a file is often a
>> fundamental
>> unit that people copy around.
>
> Does "MODULE_L
On 12 September 2013 02:27, Jeff Epler wrote:
> I personally prefer that each individual file have a copyright notice
> and license grant where possible, because a file is often a fundamental
> unit that people copy around.
Does "MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");" or the equivalent in a .comp file
suffice,
Jeff,
On 9/11/2013 6:27 PM, Jeff Epler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 07:41:36PM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>> If there are no objections, I will add a header indicating I release the
>> various device tree files I wrote into the public domain.
> I would greatly prefer not calling new co
On Sep 11 2013 7:27 PM, Jeff Epler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 07:41:36PM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>> If there are no objections, I will add a header indicating I release
>> the
>> various device tree files I wrote into the public domain.
>
> I would greatly prefer not calling new c
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 07:41:36PM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> If there are no objections, I will add a header indicating I release the
> various device tree files I wrote into the public domain.
I would greatly prefer not calling new contributions to LinuxCNC "public
domain". As we have
On 9/11/2013 3:14 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>> = configs/ARM/BeagleBone/BeBoPr-Bridge/BB-LCNC-BEBOPRBR-00A0.dts
>> = configs/ARM/BeagleBone/K9/Device_Tree_Overlays/BB-BLACK-LCNC-K9-00A0.dts
>> = configs/ARM/BeagleBone/K9/Shapeoko/temp/LCNC-BBB-K9S-00A0.dts
These are part of the configuration
