On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 at 00:22, Steffen Möller via Emc-developers <
emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> In an ideal world, the -rtai package would only ship binaries/scripts that
> depend on rtai and the -rt package would ship the binaries that depend on
> the default rt kernel
I don'
On Monday, January 20, 2025 at 06:20:33 PM CST, Steffen Möller via
Emc-developers wrote:
>Is there any scenario for which both real-time flavors would be installed at
>the same time?
Definitely not. LinuxCNC needs to be built differently for RTAI, and you cannot
run PREEMPT_RT and RTAI at t
f: Re: [Emc-developers] LinuxCNC package name
>
> Looking at Linux kernel names there is:
> linux-image without postfix this is ordinary user space I think anyway
> suitable for simulation.
> linux-image-rt this is with real time
> linux-image-rtai
>
> Below make sens
The issue is that linuxcnc and linuxcnc-rt would be the same as linuxcnc
doesn't get built differently, whether you're using POSIX rt threads, or POSIX
non-rt threads. I think it should be `linuxcnc` and `linuxcnc-rtai`. linuxcnc's
binaries only change if using RTAI.
Alec
On Friday, January
Looking at Linux kernel names there is:
linux-image without postfix this is ordinary user space I think anyway
suitable for simulation.
linux-image-rt this is with real time
linux-image-rtai
Below make sense?
linucnc
linucnc-rt
linucnc-rtai
Nicklas
tor 2025-01-16 klockan 11:07 -050
On 16/01/2025 17:38, andy pugh wrote:
It is perhaps unfortunate that the name of the LinuxCNC package on Debian
is "linuxcnc-uspace"
It would probably make more sense for the package name to be "linuxcnc" and
to have "linucnc-rtai" as an alternative from our own servers (where the
rtai package
On 1/16/25 10:39, andy pugh wrote:
It is perhaps unfortunate that the name of the LinuxCNC package on Debian
is "linuxcnc-uspace"
It would probably make more sense for the package name to be "linuxcnc" and
to have "linucnc-rtai" as an alternative from our own servers (where the
rtai packages exi
It is perhaps unfortunate that the name of the LinuxCNC package on Debian
is "linuxcnc-uspace"
It would probably make more sense for the package name to be "linuxcnc" and
to have "linucnc-rtai" as an alternative from our own servers (where the
rtai packages exist)
Can we change this for the 2.10
