[mailto:rwe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 12:10 PM
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Possibly dumb question about NML buffer size
Ok, that makes sense. Could we safely fix the tool table size limitation by
increasing the NML buffer size? I've been playing arou
gt; Sent: Friday, 4 April 2014 4:24 AM
> > To: EMC developers
> > Subject: [Emc-developers] Possibly dumb question about NML buffer size
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Is there a hard limit on the size of the NML buffers defined in
> linuxcnc.nml? If
> > not, does anyon
, and linuxcnc doesn't work.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Ellenberg [mailto:rwe...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, 4 April 2014 4:24 AM
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: [Emc-developers] Possibly dumb question about NML buffer size
>
> Hi All,
>
> Is there
On 04/03/2014 11:23 AM, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> Is there a hard limit on the size of the NML buffers defined in
> linuxcnc.nml? If not, does anyone know if increasing the buffer size leads
> to a performance hit on a modern PC? I couldn't find much info on how the
> channel buffer sizes were chos
Hi All,
Is there a hard limit on the size of the NML buffers defined in
linuxcnc.nml? If not, does anyone know if increasing the buffer size leads
to a performance hit on a modern PC? I couldn't find much info on how the
channel buffer sizes were chosen on the web.
Thanks,
Rob
---
