As one can see, for some people I have skabies.
Female fuss like ignoring, indirect speech, talking about relationships etc.
are 80% of the content here.
Yes, I'm exaggerating but sometimes it's nearly so.
And I have thought machining is a typical male domain.
And this behavour is infectious...
On 7 April 2014 08:23, EBo wrote:
> I guess the question is that if we can fix it, should we? What is the
> prognosis of a replacement? I know people have been talking about it
> for a decade or more now, so if there is not one on the horizon, then
> maybe we should look at least taking care of
On Apr 6 2014 8:41 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> On 04/06/2014 03:52 PM, EBo wrote:
>> I've broken away a *little* time to start working on LinuxCNC again,
>> via gentoocnc..
>>
>> The tools I use are reporting the following QA/QC issues. I am not
>> sure if I will be able to address these anyt
On 04/06/2014 03:52 PM, EBo wrote:
> I've broken away a *little* time to start working on LinuxCNC again,
> via gentoocnc..
>
> The tools I use are reporting the following QA/QC issues. I am not
> sure if I will be able to address these anytime soon, so I thought I
> would at least report them
On Apr 6 2014 5:59 PM, W. Martinjak wrote:
> On 2014-04-07 01:40, EBo wrote:
>> On Apr 6 2014 5:16 PM, W. Martinjak wrote:
>>> Hi EBo,
>>>
>>> On 2014-04-06 23:52, EBo wrote:
I've broken away a *little* time to start working on LinuxCNC
again,
via gentoocnc..
>>> I assume this
On 2014-04-07 01:40, EBo wrote:
> On Apr 6 2014 5:16 PM, W. Martinjak wrote:
>> Hi EBo,
>>
>> On 2014-04-06 23:52, EBo wrote:
>>> I've broken away a *little* time to start working on LinuxCNC again,
>>> via gentoocnc..
>>>
>> I assume this is on a 64bit machine!?
> yes. One a Gentoo distro.
>
>
On 7 April 2014 00:45, EBo wrote:
>> I have a feeling that NML explicity relies on passing pointers around
>> and deciding at the use-end what is in there.
> Fair enough. As long as we know that it is something we choose to live
> with instead of just ignoring it.
Don't go taking my word as re
On Apr 6 2014 4:59 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 6 April 2014 22:52, EBo wrote:
>> * libnml/buffer/tcpmem.cc:195:44: warning: dereferencing
>> type-punned
>> pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Wstrict-aliasing]
>
> I have a feeling that NML explicity relies on passing pointers around
> and
On Apr 6 2014 5:16 PM, W. Martinjak wrote:
> Hi EBo,
>
> On 2014-04-06 23:52, EBo wrote:
>> I've broken away a *little* time to start working on LinuxCNC again,
>> via gentoocnc..
>>
> I assume this is on a 64bit machine!?
yes. One a Gentoo distro.
EBo --
Hi EBo,
On 2014-04-06 23:52, EBo wrote:
> I've broken away a *little* time to start working on LinuxCNC again,
> via gentoocnc..
>
I assume this is on a 64bit machine!?
Matsche
--
"In der Wissenschaft siegt nie eine neue Theorie,
nur ihre Gegner sterben nach und nach"
Max Planck
--
On 6 April 2014 22:52, EBo wrote:
> * libnml/buffer/tcpmem.cc:195:44: warning: dereferencing type-punned
> pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Wstrict-aliasing]
I have a feeling that NML explicity relies on passing pointers around
and deciding at the use-end what is in there.
So perhaps
I've broken away a *little* time to start working on LinuxCNC again,
via gentoocnc..
The tools I use are reporting the following QA/QC issues. I am not
sure if I will be able to address these anytime soon, so I thought I
would at least report them.
Hope that helps,
EBo --
12 matches
Mail list logo
