Re: [Emc-developers] Request for feature

2013-06-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 16 June 2013 16:34:48 John Kasunich did opine: > Why don't you just touch off? > > Home to any old place. > > Take a test cut at a programmed diameter of say 0.550". > That means the programmed X value is 0.2750. After > the cut, get the tool clear however you want, then move > it bac

Re: [Emc-developers] Request for feature

2013-06-15 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 15 June 2013 20:47:44 John Kasunich did opine: > Why don't you just touch off? > > Home to any old place. > > Take a test cut at a programmed diameter of say 0.550". > That means the programmed X value is 0.2750. After > the cut, get the tool clear however you want, then move > it b

Re: [Emc-developers] Request for feature

2013-06-15 Thread John Kasunich
Why don't you just touch off? Home to any old place. Take a test cut at a programmed diameter of say 0.550". That means the programmed X value is 0.2750. After the cut, get the tool clear however you want, then move it back to X=0.2750 (I usually just do an MDI command). Mic the part you just t

[Emc-developers] Request for feature

2013-06-15 Thread Gene Heskett
Greets all; I am still in the process of 'calibrating' this thing, having whipped the motor speeds into shape with a lincurve between the pid.out and the pwmge.value in pins. Works nicely now. And it only took another iteration to get the Z home position set about a thou off the face of the n