On Fri, 3 May 2019 at 04:03, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> According to the log, it's not happy with my use of (gasp!) a C99 feature.
> I've been writing C++ for too long, I guess.
>
Yes, I quite like the for (int i = 0;..) style for an obviously local
counter.
I don't know who would make the deci
According to the log, it's not happy with my use of (gasp!) a C99 feature.
I've been writing C++ for too long, I guess. The latest build passes now.
On Thu, May 2, 2019, 5:21 AM andy pugh wrote:
> On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 02:38, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
>
> > https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pu
On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 02:38, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pull/581
Travis isn't happy:
https://travis-ci.org/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/builds/527106726?utm_source=github_status&utm_medium=notification
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and
.m. (GMT-07:00)
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] To-Do list
>
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 at 14:07, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
>
> >
> > There are a number of Rob Ellenbergs bugfixes for the TP
> > that I dont think have been merged
> > (someone
I think we should add a couple more people for push access too John m and
Philip c come to mind...if they are interested
Original message
From: andy pugh
Date: 2019-04-28 10:07 a.m. (GMT-07:00)
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] To-Do list
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 at 14:07, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
>
> There are a number of Rob Ellenbergs bugfixes for the TP
> that I dont think have been merged
> (someone on the forum just ran into one of the fixed bugs)
I am not sure why he doesn't have direct push access. It isn't like
anyone else und
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019, andy pugh wrote:
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 00:12:49 +0100
From: andy pugh
Reply-To: EMC developers
To: EMC developers
Subject: [Emc-developers] To-Do list
Which bugs on the tracker mean that 2.8 can't be released?
I think that the unwanted motion caus
On Saturday 27 April 2019 19:12:49 andy pugh wrote:
> Which bugs on the tracker mean that 2.8 can't be released?
>
> I think that the unwanted motion caused by ON_ABORT_COMMAND needs to
> be fixed before release.
> https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/issues/579
>
> Any others? We have 21 pull req
Which bugs on the tracker mean that 2.8 can't be released?
I think that the unwanted motion caused by ON_ABORT_COMMAND needs to
be fixed before release.
https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/issues/579
Any others? We have 21 pull requests and 105 bugs..
What else needs to be done?
Update ISO dow
