On 11 July 2014 17:51, Jon Elson wrote:
> I'm speaking in generalities, but I think this is true for most
> CNC lathes.
I think that VDI is a way to repeatably swap tools in a lathe changer.
(And maybe some HSK variants)
Though I don't think what I have done needs to be 100% generic, as the
wh
On 07/11/2014 10:32 AM, Andy Pugh wrote:
> But, you seem to be saying that lathes don't use the
> tool-table pocket number?
Typically, lathes have tool turrets, with various tools
installed
on the turret. Since the way the turret is made is not exactly
perfect, swapping a tool to a different pos
> On 11 Jul 2014, at 15:57, Chris Morley wrote:
>
> T010101 is tool position 1 offset 1 wear offset 1
Can you do that with three different numbers so that I can figure out which is
which?
But, you seem to be saying that lathes don't use the tool-table pocket number?
---
s but the premise is the same for others.
- Reply message -
From: "andy pugh"
To: "EMC developers"
Subject: [Emc-developers] Tormach GUI
Date: Thu, Jul 10, 2014 6:47 PM
On 10 June 2014 17:42, andy pugh wrote:
> The G43 variant doesn't just let you have compo
On 10 June 2014 17:42, andy pugh wrote:
> The G43 variant doesn't just let you have compouind offsets using the
> LinuxCNC "Mill" style toolchange, it also means that using the G43
> variation with a Remapping of the T-word would allow T1020 to call a
> G-code sub
...
> There will, of course, be i
On 10 June 2014 17:15, Daniel Rogge wrote:
> It wasn't hard coded - it was something only enabled in an ini file, and was
> off by default.
That wasn't what I meant. I meant that it was just one fixed variant
toolhandler, rather than a generic way to allow other approaches.
> I know that you
On Jun 10 2014 10:15 AM, Daniel Rogge wrote:
>>I don't think that is quite fair.
>>There is some resistance to the iocontrol hack that hard-codes the
>> behaviour. (And there are reasons not to like the Fanuc way, too,
>> it is incompatible with the tooldatabase schema that we hacked
>> out last ye
>I don't think that is quite fair.
>There is some resistance to the iocontrol hack that hard-codes the
> behaviour. (And there are reasons not to like the Fanuc way, too,
> it is incompatible with the tooldatabase schema that we hacked
> out last year)
> Chris recently proposed a new variant o
On 10 June 2014 15:19, Daniel Rogge wrote:
> Someone would have to add this functionality to that program, which is
> unlikely because most of the linuxcnc developers aren't in favor of the Fanuc
> patch in the first place
I don't think that is quite fair.
There is some resistance to the iocon
ikely because most of the
linuxcnc developers aren't in favor of the Fanuc patch in the first place.
Rogge
-Original Message-
From: Rick Lair [mailto:r...@superiorroll.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 6:38 AM
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] T
Hello Daniel,
Have you guys made any improvements on the Fanuc tool change patch?
I have that setup on three turning centers in our shop, and it is used all
day everyday for the last year and a half. I saw in your manual for your
lathe, that the wear offsets are put in the columns next to the ac
> Daniel Rogge can tell you the status of the any part of the software.
> He monitors this list.
Well, I haven't been monitoring the list lately, but came in to find this
buried in a few weeks of old emails this morning. Some answers:
Yes - the Tormach lathe is running LCNC for the motion co
On 06/04/2014 02:13 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 4 June 2014 03:56, Jon Elson wrote:
>
>> Their G-code files have an .ngc extension in some of the
>> screenshots.
>
> I don't think there is any need for this detective work, it is no
> secret that the lathe is using LinuxCNC, it was Tormach who came u
On 4 June 2014 03:56, Jon Elson wrote:
> Their G-code files have an .ngc extension in some of the
> screenshots.
I don't think there is any need for this detective work, it is no
secret that the lathe is using LinuxCNC, it was Tormach who came up
with the Fanuc-style tool change patch for their
On 06/03/2014 01:19 PM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> 2014-06-03 16:48 GMT+03:00 Kirk Wallace :
>
>> See page 10 section 1.4.2.
>
> Section 5.3, page 42 - that backplot screen seems very familiar :))
>
>
Their G-code files have an .ngc extension in some of the
screenshots.
Another place they show detail
2014-06-03 16:48 GMT+03:00 Kirk Wallace :
>
> See page 10 section 1.4.2.
Section 5.3, page 42 - that backplot screen seems very familiar :))
Viesturs
--
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databas
On 06/03/2014 06:36 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 3 June 2014 14:35, andy pugh wrote:
>
>> file:///C:/Users/APUGH12/Downloads/UM10225_Tormach_15L_Slant-PRO_0514A_web.pdf
>
> Not to self: check the URL before hitting "Send".
>
> This link will work better for people who are not currently sat in the
> s
On 06/03/2014 06:26 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 3 June 2014 14:13, EBo wrote:
>
>> Can you post a link to what you are referring to? I did a quick check
>> and was not sure...
>
> http://www.tormach.com/product_lathe.html
>
>
The user manual and other documents are near the bottom of the page here
On 3 June 2014 14:35, andy pugh wrote:
> file:///C:/Users/APUGH12/Downloads/UM10225_Tormach_15L_Slant-PRO_0514A_web.pdf
Not to self: check the URL before hitting "Send".
This link will work better for people who are not currently sat in the
same chair as me :-)
http://www.tormach.com/uploads/7
On Jun 3 2014 7:26 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 3 June 2014 14:13, EBo wrote:
>
>> Can you post a link to what you are referring to? I did a quick
>> check
>> and was not sure...
>
> http://www.tormach.com/product_lathe.html
Thanks. I thought there might have been a cleaner image someplace.
E
On 3 June 2014 14:26, andy pugh wrote:
> http://www.tormach.com/product_lathe.html
Also, lots of screen shots in the manual:
file:///C:/Users/APUGH12/Downloads/UM10225_Tormach_15L_Slant-PRO_0514A_web.pdf
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
---
On 3 June 2014 14:13, EBo wrote:
> Can you post a link to what you are referring to? I did a quick check
> and was not sure...
http://www.tormach.com/product_lathe.html
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
On Jun 3 2014 3:32 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> The Tormach website for their new lathe shows a rather elaborate
> looking lathe GUI.
> My understanding (possibly erroneous) is that the controller on that
> lathe is LinuxCNC.
> Is there any chance that we might see that GUI available more
> generally?
The Tormach website for their new lathe shows a rather elaborate
looking lathe GUI.
My understanding (possibly erroneous) is that the controller on that
lathe is LinuxCNC.
Is there any chance that we might see that GUI available more generally?
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http:/
24 matches
Mail list logo
