Re: [Emc-developers] Transition to the git revision control system

2009-06-09 Thread Michael Buesch
On Friday 05 June 2009 18:39:05 Maxime Lemonnier wrote: > bzr offer an svn-mode So does git. -- Greetings, Michael. -- Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option th

Re: [Emc-developers] Transition to the git revision control system

2009-06-08 Thread Chris Radek
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 03:01:35PM -0500, Chris Radek wrote: > These are all the people who have ever checked in any code to > EMC. Oops, I think this is not true. These are people who have committed to EMC2. I assumed it was "ever" because of Fred P's name being there. -

Re: [Emc-developers] Transition to the git revision control system

2009-06-08 Thread Chris Radek
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 01:15:39PM -0400, maxime lemonnier wrote: > The more I read on git, the less I think it is well suited for EMC. Baazar > seems much cleaner. Sourceforge can host bzr (but, since EMC is packaged for > ubuntu, why not switch to launchpad?) Sourceforge hosts git and bzr both.

Re: [Emc-developers] Transition to the git revision control system

2009-06-08 Thread maxime lemonnier
The more I read on git, the less I think it is well suited for EMC. Baazar seems much cleaner. Sourceforge can host bzr (but, since EMC is packaged for ubuntu, why not switch to launchpad?) Here are the most convincing arguments, imo : >From : http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrVsGit#Bazaar%20vs%20Git * *

Re: [Emc-developers] Transition to the git revision control system

2009-06-05 Thread paul_c
On Friday 05 June 2009, Maxime Lemonnier wrote: > I'm new to emc-developpers list, so I decided to shut up over this. Just because you are new does not exclude you from any discussion, nor does it invalidate your opinion - Without it, any preemptive decision would be illegitimate. > But I pers

Re: [Emc-developers] Transition to the git revision control system

2009-06-05 Thread Maxime Lemonnier
Hi, I'm new to emc-developpers list, so I decided to shut up over this. But I personnally think that bzr on lauchpad would have been a much more sensible choice. bzr offer an svn-mode which is quite handy for IDE with source-control integration. linuxcnc.org would have then hosted the wiki/web

Re: [Emc-developers] Transition to the git revision control system

2009-06-04 Thread paul_c
On Saturday 30 May 2009, Jeff Epler wrote: > After a discussion among board members, developers and users present at > the 2009 emc fest (as well as previous discussions on the #emc-devel irc > channel), the board of directors has voted unanimously to transition to > the git revision control system

Re: [Emc-developers] Transition to the git revision control system

2009-06-02 Thread John Thornton
I won't need it. Git seems easy enough with the gui's it is much easier to see what your about to commit. John On 1 Jun 2009 at 18:07, Jeff Epler wrote: > In the earlier announcement, I mentioned that git has a cvs server > emulation mode that we can use if necessary. Are there any > developers

Re: [Emc-developers] Transition to the git revision control system

2009-06-01 Thread Jeff Epler
In the earlier announcement, I mentioned that git has a cvs server emulation mode that we can use if necessary. Are there any developers who know they will require this emulation to be enabled (and if so, why)? Please speak up now--it will simplify planning if we know this is not a requirement.

[Emc-developers] Transition to the git revision control system

2009-05-30 Thread Jeff Epler
After a discussion among board members, developers and users present at the 2009 emc fest (as well as previous discussions on the #emc-devel irc channel), the board of directors has voted unanimously to transition to the git revision control system. Since it was created as a sourceforge project ne