Re: [Emc-developers] fixing interpreter "line numbers" and run-from-line

2012-03-28 Thread Kim Kirwan
Hi Michael, I tried your "fractional-linenumbers" branch and it appears to work great, it allows (and still ignores, as always) N-numbers up to N.999 and even up to N9.999, which should be more than enough, unless someone has additional requirements. (It may even go higher, I just didn't t

Re: [Emc-developers] fixing interpreter "line numbers" and run-from-line

2012-03-23 Thread Michael Haberler
please try this and let me know if this is what you want: http://git.mah.priv.at/gitweb/emc2-dev.git/shortlog/refs/heads/fractional-linenumbers -m Am 23.03.2012 um 06:56 schrieb Kim Kirwan: > Hi Michael, > > This is probably the wrong place to mention this, but... > > It would be great if at

Re: [Emc-developers] fixing interpreter "line numbers" and run-from-line

2012-03-23 Thread Michael Haberler
Kim, this shouldnt be hard to do (where's the linuxcnc volunteer force when we need them ;) however it's strictly an interpreter lexical issue since the N-numbers are ignored anyway, and have no bearing on the semantics of sloc's/source context -m Am 23.03.2012 um 06:56 schrieb Kim Kirwan:

Re: [Emc-developers] fixing interpreter "line numbers" and run-from-line

2012-03-22 Thread Kim Kirwan
Hi Michael, This is probably the wrong place to mention this, but... It would be great if at some point LinuxCNC (LCNC?) could also accept (in g-code) N-numbers ranging from (at least) N0 (N.000) to N.999. This would allow Autocon/Dynapath control users to load their existing g-code into

Re: [Emc-developers] fixing interpreter "line numbers" and run-from-line

2012-03-21 Thread Michael Haberler
Kirk, Am 21.03.2012 um 21:30 schrieb Kirk Wallace: > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 18:57 +0100, Michael Haberler wrote: >> One of the glaring interpreter issues I consider repairing is the current >> state of affairs of "line numbers". >> >> I have laid out the issue, and a sketch for a solution here: >

Re: [Emc-developers] fixing interpreter "line numbers" and run-from-line

2012-03-21 Thread Kirk Wallace
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 18:57 +0100, Michael Haberler wrote: > One of the glaring interpreter issues I consider repairing is the current > state of affairs of "line numbers". > > I have laid out the issue, and a sketch for a solution here: > > http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?LineNumbers >

[Emc-developers] fixing interpreter "line numbers" and run-from-line

2012-03-21 Thread Michael Haberler
One of the glaring interpreter issues I consider repairing is the current state of affairs of "line numbers". I have laid out the issue, and a sketch for a solution here: http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?LineNumbers I plan to do something about it - but only after the requirements have