Re: [Emc-developers] joints_axes6 status

2014-12-09 Thread sam sokolik
let me try to find some of the issues we ran into. I think they should be on irc.. sam On 12/09/2014 05:41 PM, Robert Ellenberg wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm curious what the current state of joints_axes6 is. I'm working on a > CoreXY configuration that would really benefit from specifying limits in

Re: [Emc-developers] joints_axes6 status

2014-12-09 Thread andy pugh
On 9 December 2014 at 23:52, andy pugh wrote: > A kins where you defined an affine transform matrix would be rather > more general. And probably wouldn't get used very much :-) Actually, it would be a neat solution for the guy on the forum wanting to make mirror-image parts... (switching matric

Re: [Emc-developers] joints_axes6 status

2014-12-09 Thread andy pugh
On 9 December 2014 at 23:41, Robert Ellenberg wrote: > Also, is there any interest in a generalized linear kinematics module for > the XYZ axes? The way I'm thinking of it now, it would combine an arbitrary > rotation matrix and shear / scale transforms. The rotation matrix would > deal with rotat

[Emc-developers] joints_axes6 status

2014-12-09 Thread Robert Ellenberg
Hi All, I'm curious what the current state of joints_axes6 is. I'm working on a CoreXY configuration that would really benefit from specifying limits in world space rather than joint space, so the changes in ja6 would be a great help. Is there a public discussion / development resource I can refe