Added documentation. I hope I did it correctly.
Citando Filipe Tomaz :
No. The document part:
3. FANUC LIKE TOOL ORIENTATIONS & ARCS
is wrong. Any Fanuc manual have it correct. For example:
https://forum.linuxcnc.org/forum/26-turning/26065-current-turning-capabilities-status?start=110
No. The document part:
3. FANUC LIKE TOOL ORIENTATIONS & ARCS
is wrong. Any Fanuc manual have it correct. For example:
https://forum.linuxcnc.org/forum/26-turning/26065-current-turning-capabilities-status?start=110
(post 40105) have an attachment that I sent back in 2013.
Citando Robe
Does this follow the wiki page info i added quite some time back??
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?BackToolLathe
rob
On 19/03/2016 22:52, Filipe Tomaz wrote:
> Please add this feature to linuxcnc. It does not change the behavior
> unless
> user places on the ini file, on the EMCIO secti
Thank you for addressing most of the issues I raised in my earlier
e-mail.
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 03:01:37PM +, Filipe Tomaz wrote:
>If it could be in this email then the documentation would be:
The documentation is written in asciidoc files with extension ".txt".
Use the same style of m
Thanks Filipe ,
i will certianly give this patch a try .
On 20 March 2016 at 15:01, Filipe Tomaz wrote:
> 2nd attempt
>
>Changes:
>Signed-off
>Solved when a tool table is written by Gcode such as G10
>Corrected indentation for 4 space/tab
>
>What I still did not do:
>Doc
2nd attempt
Changes:
Signed-off
Solved when a tool table is written by Gcode such as G10
Corrected indentation for 4 space/tab
What I still did not do:
Documentation for the changes. I do not know where the documentation
should be placed. In this email? in a separated file that
Thank you for offering this patch to improve LinuxCNC.
I don't know enough about lathes or fanuc gcode to evaluate whether the
general idea of changing orientation numbers in this way is right or
wrong. I hope someone else will be able to do this. Instead, my notes
below are all boring technical
