Re: [Emc-developers] state of preempt-RT

2014-07-10 Thread Jiri Kastner
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 05:28:42 -0600, EBo wrote: > On Jul 9 2014 5:16 AM, W. Martinjak wrote: >> Sounds not well for RT... >> >> Citation: >> 'After my last talk about the state of preempt-RT at LinuxCon Japan, >> Linus told me: "That was far more depressing than I feared".' >> >> http://lkml.iu.edu

Re: [Emc-developers] state of preempt-RT

2014-07-09 Thread W. Martinjak
On 2014-07-09 16:26, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 09 July 2014 07:16:57 W. Martinjak did opine > And Gene did reply: >> Sounds not well for RT... >> >> Citation: >> 'After my last talk about the state of preempt-RT at LinuxCon Japan, >> Linus told me: "That was far more depressing than I fear

Re: [Emc-developers] state of preempt-RT

2014-07-09 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 09 July 2014 07:28:42 EBo did opine And Gene did reply: > On Jul 9 2014 5:16 AM, W. Martinjak wrote: > > Sounds not well for RT... > > > > Citation: > > 'After my last talk about the state of preempt-RT at LinuxCon Japan, > > Linus told me: "That was far more depressing than I feared"

Re: [Emc-developers] state of preempt-RT

2014-07-09 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 09 July 2014 07:16:57 W. Martinjak did opine And Gene did reply: > Sounds not well for RT... > > Citation: > 'After my last talk about the state of preempt-RT at LinuxCon Japan, > Linus told me: "That was far more depressing than I feared".' > > http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/ker

Re: [Emc-developers] state of preempt-RT

2014-07-09 Thread EBo
On Jul 9 2014 5:16 AM, W. Martinjak wrote: > Sounds not well for RT... > > Citation: > 'After my last talk about the state of preempt-RT at LinuxCon Japan, > Linus told me: "That was far more depressing than I feared".' > > http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1407.0/04111.html > > Are there s