Re: Self Declare to FCC-B

1997-06-17 Thread Mark Briggs
Brian, > Our products also comply to the FCC class B requirements but we do not > wish to go through the added cost and time to obtain an FCC grant or > to have our products tested to an accredited test lab. > > I know I can self declare to FCC-A but would like to self declare t

Re: Better Storage Tests

1997-06-17 Thread Steve Chin
Ok, that was for lack of a better title. Anyway, Steve, my company produces a line of storage equipment which uses various disk drives, etc. When changing a component as major as the drive in the system, we evaluate the risks involved and usually end up testing the entire system again fro emiss

picture of product label

1997-06-17 Thread Bob Brister
Hello, Would anyone have an electronic version of an equipment/power rating label that they would not mind sharing? I am looking for a label to use as a sample on a web page and I do not want to peel one off a product just to scan it. thanks, Robert Brister EHS Senior Associate Digital Equi

RE: Self Declare to FCC-B

1997-06-17 Thread POWELL, DOUG
Brian, I have also used European EMC testing without FCC using CISPR 11 (EN55011) Class A Group 2. Occasionally we have a customer that needs to see FCC part 18 compliance and we have asked out test lab (TUVPS, Boulder, Colorado) to use the test data from the CISPR test and translate it into

RE: How to specify IEC fuses

1997-06-17 Thread DouglasScott
Heber, I had the same problem with fuses in one of my products. We shipped "American" 5x20 mm fuses and they did not blow. However, when replaced by a fuse bought locally in the UK, they did blow prematurely. The only way we found around this was to specify a replacement fuse supplied by our co

Re: Self Declare to FCC-B

1997-06-17 Thread tania . grant
Brian, You can "self-verify" to Class B under the FCC Rules, Part 15. Read your Part 2 Rules for definitions of "verification" vs. "certification". Then you can use the Class B text, except substitute "...has been certified to" to "...has been verified to Cl

RE: Distance of Measurements, 55011

1997-06-17 Thread Flinders, Randall
Eric, You are correct in your evaluation of EN 55011 (Cispr 11). Keep in mind that the situation of not allowing distance correction is only found in Cispr 11, NOT Cispr 22. In reference to this specification, I had the opportunity to converse with several Competent Bodies in reference to Ci

Self Declare to FCC-B

1997-06-17 Thread Brian_Kunde
My company manufactures products that do no legally have to have FCC. Because of the EMC directive in Europe we are testing our products and self declaring compliance to EN55011 class B. Our products also comply to the FCC class B requirements but we do not wish to

How to specify IEC fuses

1997-06-17 Thread Farnsworth,Heber
I want to specify in a user manual the use of IEC 127 fuses rather than U.S./Canadian fuses, and need to find wording that is clear and concise, especially to Americans. Suggestions please? Since the fuse curves are significantly different, the use of the American style fuse can lead to premature

Distance of Measurements, 55011

1997-06-17 Thread BARRON_MANNY
Don't forget about the generic industrial emission standard EN50081-2(1993), which specifies testing per EN55011. Table I of EN50081-2 defines the 30-37 dBuV/m limit levels as measured at 30m distance, but also states the following: "May be measured at 10m distance using the limits increase

950 amendment 4

1997-06-17 Thread mvaldman
Hello again, as we know, IEC950 amendment 4 is out for some time. Can someone please send a note of the changes (DELTA) it contains relative to the previous version? thanks - Name: moshe valdman E-mail: mvald...@netvision.net.il Phone: 052-941200, 03-5496369